• Hjalmar@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    What a hell’s up with the kami-computer-kaze dude in the middle of the road?

    • LikeableLime@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 hours ago

      That’s the author/artist self insert he always puts himself in the corner somewhere with commentary about the illustration.

  • Blaster M@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Where I’m at, they added a “bike lane” on the highway… Which is literally just the shoulder barely wide enough for a cyclist… on a very busy highway that sees lots of trucks and trailers and wide loads, in addition to people travelling at highway speeds. No divider, just a paint line.

    That’s not a bike lane, that’s an accident about to happen.

    We need real bike lanes, divided by something more than 2 inches of paint, to prevent traffic fatalities.

  • BillyClark@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    16 hours ago

    This depicts a two lane road with no bike lane.

    The cyclist should actually be in the middle of the lane or even slightly left of middle to avoid motorists trying to squeeze by them in the same lane, like in the comic, which creates a dangerous circumstance for the cyclist, having fast moving vehicles passing inches away.

    It’s funny how often you see drivers taking a right turn and they are terrified of scraping their tire on the curb, so they have a several foot gap. But we should trust them to know where the right side of their car is when squeezing past a cyclist? I admit they can see better in that situation, but the risk is all on the cyclist.

    The safest circumstance for the cyclist is if there is a car behind them who is not passing. But most motorists like to go faster than a bicycle.

    The motorist should pass the bicycle in the same way they’d pass any other slower moving vehicle, by using the oncoming lane in a passing zone.

    Of course, that creates its own sort of danger because inattentive drivers may come up onto the bicycle too quickly and then they won’t have a place to swerve to at the last moment.

    And all of that is simply about the safety of the cyclist. Obviously, some places will have ridiculous laws that force cyclists into dangerous situations.

    But realistically, with the attitudes and complete lack of driving skills of most drivers, cyclists are taking risks just by using roads like that.

    • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      13 hours ago

      In Spain drivers are required to leave 1.5m gap when overtaking a cyclist. In my experience 99% of them respect that. It’s way more common for them to leave a gap and force the driver going in the other direction to slow down than to pass to close to me. Overall drivers suck here (worst in Spain) but this one rule they do obey.

      • BillyClark@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        In America, I think drivers don’t know how to drive around cyclists, so quite a few will drive frighteningly close. I wouldn’t care to guess about the percentage.

        But even 1% is a lot of people. A bicycle even on a short trip will be passed by 10s of cars. So, if you bike everywhere, that might be 1 close call a day. So, I’m guessing that Spain is not actually as dangerous as 1% and you were just picking a large number.

        • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 hours ago

          I don’t think about each time a driver passes me a closer than 1.5m as a “close call”. Once I went off the road and fell right into 1.5m deep ditch. Now that was a close call… I still don’t know how I didn’t hurt myself. I did get fired next day but it was unrelated.

    • philipp_@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Around here bike people:

      Die because of distracted drivers.

      Die because Trucks can’t bother to properly check all their mirrors.

      Die because drivers speeding.

      I think bikes would be way better if you wouldn’t risk getting killed by drivers any time you do it.

      • Jesus_666@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Shit, I once had someone tell me with a straight face that it’s not a trucker’s fault if they run over cyclists when turning around corners. Not because of dead angles but because they can’t be expected to check their mirror every time they make a turn; they’re too busy fiddling with their GPS and getting the freight papers sorted.

        While making turns. Apparently they’re too busy to do that when the vehicle’s stopped or at the very least while they’re driving straight and thus they should be exempt from having to obey traffic rules.

    • SwingingTheLamp@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Ignore mandatory dismount locations

      When cars were new, Wisconsin law required a flagman to walk ahead of the vehicle as it traveled, to warn other people and ensure that the way was clear. I’d love to see that return, in analogous locations. That is, a passenger has to get out and walk the car through.

      I wouldn’t expect drivers to follow that law, because you can barely count on them to follow any traffic laws, but still.

    • destructdisc@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      19 hours ago

      As opposed to drivers, who never do any of those things, I’m sure.

      Also

      Go over the speed limit.

      What

      • Successful_Try543@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Go over the speed limit.

        What

        It may be on streets where speed is limited to either “walking pace” or ten-ish mph (20 km/h) or the bikers simply have strong legs.

        • grue@lemmy.world
          shield
          M
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          25
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Vehicles that can go 60 MPH are motorcycles, not e-bikes. If you repeat that false claim it will be considered misinformation and removed.

          • azimir@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            12 hours ago

            If a vehicle goes over 25 kph in Germany it’s a moped. You need a drivers license, insurance and registration. So, many imported E-bikes legally require moped rules, but all too few follow it.

            • Successful_Try543@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 hours ago

              But mopeds are limited to 45 km/h, so everything beyond counts as a regular motorcycle. Every once in a while the police stops people driving e-bikes with deactivated limiter that are able to go 70 or even 90 km/h.

            • grue@lemmy.world
              shield
              M
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              13
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              18 hours ago

              If you don’t know my local laws, you can’t claim I am spreading misinformation.

              If you wanted me to believe you based on your local laws, you should’ve cited them (or at least told us the jurisdiction you’re talking about).

                • grue@lemmy.world
                  shield
                  M
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  12
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  16 hours ago

                  Misinformation conflating illegal unlicensed e-motocycles is a huge problem that is resulting in legal e-bikes getting unfairly blamed and sometimes even confiscated and destroyed. This community will not contribute to it.

                  You can either accept that, have a conversation about how the specific jurisdiction you’re talking about is behind the curve on regulation so that we can productively discuss ways to help fix the problem in that jurisdiction (because that’s a different problem than other places have with existing rules not getting enforced correctly), or leave. In no scenario will you be allowed to use this community to spread FUD and lies.

            • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              18 hours ago

              A lot of laws have been passed to limit bike speeds at this point, what are you talking about?

              Ebikes aren’t a new technology anymore.

                • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  ·
                  16 hours ago

                  There are higher level county/perish/state/territory/national laws that apply, there was never a need to wait for every little town to pass their own boutique laws.

    • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      18 hours ago

      I don’t doubt you’ve seen those things, but you seem to be implying a) it’s not just a small minority and b) when bikes do those things, they’re just as dangerous as any bad driver. Neither of which are true.

    • Ariselas@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      And in Alberta, car people:

      Drive the wrong way into incoming traffic in the middle of the road.

      Ignore all stoplights.

      Ignore traffic lights.

      Go over the speed limit.

      Drive on the sidewalk.

      • Ned Yeung 🍉@beige.party
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        19 hours ago

        @Ariselas And they NEVER yield right-of-way to those who have it. Unless they have the right-of-way, then they’ll stop the flow of traffic to force it on somebody else as a (very dangerous) “courtesy”, and get angry when vulnerable road users don’t take it. They just don’t understand right-of-way at all.

    • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      18 hours ago

      I always try to be responsible and cautious when riding a bike. The thing is, often the road layout is so hostile to cyclists, there is just no way to follow the rules and be safe. Having said that, of course traffic rules should also be enforced on cyclists and some people are just irredeemable idiots. But the main problems are bad cycling infrastructure and inconsiderate or distracted drivers. I’d rather have the irredeemable idiots ride a bike than drive a three ton truck.

      • Ioughttamow@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Biking on sidewalks is perfectly legal where I’m at, the only exception I can think of is when the sidewalk abuts a building, and usually where that occurs I’m mostly comfortable with on road biking