• bonesawmcl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    As a linked article in the OP states, this is already in use in Russian and Ukrainian drones. Nothing particularly new, but still terrifying af.

  • moldy_rice@piefed.keyboardvagabond.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    Jesus. This is going to be the tool of choice for terrorists and assassins next year.

    How the hell do you defend against this?

    Edit: I think the only solution is to build autonomous drones that attack autonomous drones.

    We should probably create a “sky battle bots” competition with Foss drones to get ahead of this asap

    • 0x0@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Drones, lasers, magnets, nets, buckshot

      Preferably controlled by ai to make it autonomous

  • BallyM@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    20 hours ago

    What’s the likelihood that Nvidia Jetson Orin Nano can tell effectively if someone is surrendering or is an innocent bystander?

    • dropdrip@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      They don’t care. Just another tally to add to their spreadsheet under the column titled “collateral”. The Americans realized they could greatly reduce that total number with a very convenient assumption: any male of a certain age was probably in service to the taliban so they’re a legitimate target.

      • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        That didn’t start with Afghanistan.

        The scene from Apocalypse Now with “Anyone who runs is a VC, and anyone who doesn’t is a well disciplined VC”.

        They would notify everyone in a village they had to go to the concentration camps, then designate the area a “Specified Strike Zone”, where every man, woman, animal, structure, and crops were considered to be enemies. Some of these areas had arsenic dropped on them to poison the crops via Agent Blue so nobody could move back in.

        Before that, in Korea, standing orders for the airforce was to strafe any group of 5 or more civilians, because they must secretly be soldiers.

      • BallyM@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Exactly. NATO states are funding the development of weapons systems which are incompatible with the Geneva Conventions.

        • 0x0@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          25 years ago swedish society would be in shambles even considering joining nato. We held citizens votes about joining eu and changing our currency to euro.

          Recently when sweden joined nato citizens got no say at all in the matter, the only deciding factor was corrupt politicians, their wallets and big brother

  • jtrek@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    1 day ago

    This should be illegal and everyone involved should be barred from working in related fields for life. Straight to community service. Let them reconnect with humanity.

    • moldy_rice@piefed.keyboardvagabond.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 hours ago

      The demonstrations, license, and funding come before any official NATO procurement order or actual combat deployment. Concerns about lethal autonomous weapons are being addressed by a UN expert group. Its recent report concluded that human judgment and control are required to comply with the laws of war; its recommendations will be reviewed in Geneva in November

      You should probably go to Geneva in November

  • h0tbeef@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    23 hours ago

    If y’all think this technology isn’t eventually coming back home then I have a bridge to sell you

    • Bustedknuckles@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 day ago

      The argument is that drones can be jammed if they use wireless controls, and when piloted by fiber optics have limited range /can still sometimes have the fiber cut. Autonomous drones are the answer to the countermeasures being used in Ukraine/Russia right now.

      So there’s an excuse but it’s still horrifying

    • witty_username@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yup. Might as well just dump a bunch of landmines. Probably cheaper.
      I’m not saying that I approve of any of this, just that this drone tech seems like a solution without a problem

    • moldy_rice@piefed.keyboardvagabond.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      The demonstrations, license, and funding come before any official NATO procurement order or actual combat deployment. Concerns about lethal autonomous weapons are being addressed by a UN expert group. Its recent report concluded that human judgment and control are required to comply with the laws of war; its recommendations will be reviewed in Geneva in November

      Go to Geneva

    • sidebro@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      23 hours ago

      At the time, they were dependent on solar power. It was believed they would be unable to survive without an energy source as abundant as the sun.

    • moldy_rice@piefed.keyboardvagabond.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 hours ago

      The demonstrations, license, and funding come before any official NATO procurement order or actual combat deployment. Concerns about lethal autonomous weapons are being addressed by a UN expert group. Its recent report concluded that human judgment and control are required to comply with the laws of war; its recommendations will be reviewed in Geneva in November

      Looks like they’re going to look into this in November

      • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Huh, I will be pleasantly surprised if the same governments whose companies are developing this tech and itching to use it in Ukraine and Palestine support its ban.

          • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            It is governments which sign the Geneva convention, and the “judges, game theory experts, activists, NGO reps, ethics philosophers, etc” they allow/amplify are ultimately further expressions of those governments.

            We come back to “everything is political”, which is 100x more true for technocratic entities that claim to just be calling balls and strikes.

    • ohulancutash@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Ukraine already admitted to using indiscriminate killer drones in battle, which is a war crime, but no-one seems to care much.

  • Ludicrous0251@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    Man, I was just thinking I my Waymo was packed with explosives. They never make mistakes and should be free to bomb without oversight.