• spacesatan@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    This is some of the dumbest shit I have ever read. And I don’t mean conceptually, I mean everybody playing improv on what actually happened.

    Some guy says ‘during interviews some developers now care about how much compute budget they have access to’

    Every idiot since then: ‘omg company scrip???’

    I am so tired of the groupthink yes-and game on social media. Any stupid bullshit gets boosted if it plays to confirmation bias while any pushback is reflexively punished.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      The problem is that it definitely feels like something a libertarian tech bro would try.

      It’s also not entirely false, or at least without precedent.

      Richardson has a unique and progressive way of running his company. To update an old adage, Richardson is putting his bitcoin where his mouth is. His platform pays its 250-plus employees in bitcoin. He takes his pay this way too. The company has opted for the bitcoin standard to both show commitment to the cause and streamline payroll for its global workforce.

  • AeonFelis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 days ago

    This idea was most recently floated by Thibault Sottiaux at OpenAI: [Twitter, archive]

    I am increasingly asked during candidate interviews how much dedicated inference compute they will have to build with Codex.

    Aren’t these candidates asking about token budgets for doing their job? This has nothing to do with compensation…

    • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      They likely don’t know their staff have lives outside of the company and assume they are on board with everything as they are a family.

  • Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    A plot point in Terry Pratchett’s book Going Postal was postage stamps being used as currency, because they were backed by the postal system, which was seen as trustworthy.

    This is a similar line of thinking, but far more delusional, as an AI company is nowhere near as trusted as the postal service.

    • Jesus_666@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      5 days ago

      Except these stamps can’t even be handed over to someone else so you can’t even pay for anything with them. So the delusion is that you’re going to want to spend a significant part of your income on LM tokens no matter what.

  • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    They’re going to have these giant data centers, and they will have residences next door, and a small little town will grow up around it, and the only money allowed will be company scrip, and these people will be trapped, essentially slaves.

  • Cnote5@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    5 days ago

    You load 16 gigs, and what do you get? Sudo apt update && apt upgrade, Admin dont you call on me, cause I can’t compute, I owe my soul to the LLM.

    • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 days ago

      The Business Insider article this article references makes a big stretch to try to frame it as compensation:

      In other words, access to AI may soon matter as much as access to a fat salary and juicy equity awards. As a coder in the AI era, if you don’t have access to massive compute, you might end up producing far less software than your colleagues, threatening your career prospects.

      But what they’re talking about is pretty clearly a business expense and not payment, because it’s something they only get to use at work in order to do their job.

      • GarboDog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        That’s stupid. That’s like saying “instead of paying you a livable wage, here’s some pants! I mean you need to wear pants for work right? You can use them at home too!”

        Mf really out here thinking we use AI let alone wear pants in our own dang home. We want to cold hard cash! 💶💶💶!!! Lol

        • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          I don’t think they are even going to allow them to use these credits at home honestly, the whole idea is just that being able to claim that a previous job gave you $X in AI credits is valuable for a resume and and so counts as compensation. They aren’t even talking about AI companies themselves doing this, it’s speculation about other companies spending 100k a year per worker on AI and why that would be worth it. Kind of what you would expect from an article that is mostly about things people said on LinkedIn I guess.

        • potoooooooo ✅️@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          Pretty much literally what company stores used to do/what they want to do again. Except pants were an actual, useful, tangible thing.

  • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Any employee willing to be paid by token or crypto gets what they deserve. The only reason these companies can get away with this crap is because the proletariat are allowing it.

    You need a job, and you want it to be exciting; that’s understandable. Maybe you’re trying to break into the industry. Yes, it’s tough. People will tell you that you’ve got to pay your dues or some other “toe the line” bullshit.

    People need to realize that companies are not friends, they are a means to an end. And you are their means to an end. They will use you, just like you will use them. If they want you to work pong hours for as little pay as they can get away with, walk away. There are other jobs out there. They may not be glamorous, but they are out there.