Yes, but the threshold isn’t a law, it’s entirely up to them whose passports they revoke. Lowering it doesn’t obligate them to revoke anyone’s whose balance is above the threshold, just enables them to. They can just say, “now we’re revoking passports for some people with $300+ of child support outstanding” (so essentially any missed or even upcoming month’s payment), and then only revoke the passports for identified Democrat voters. Or they can just go by names, and target specific demographics. Name sounds “not white”? Revoked.

America: 250 years without violent class warfare.

Um, excuse me? What now?

Don’t be surprised if they lower the threshold significantly before the midterms or 2028.

This, combined with the SAVE act and the voter rolls they’re trying to get from Blue states, is an obvious way to invalidate an ID that would otherwise be ‘secure’ against the SAVE act, and to do it selectively.

The only people who could stop ICE from masking (apart from the people they work for) are Congress or police. Congress won’t, and states are too afraid of being declared “in open insurrection” to try. Also, whether they’d even listen to Congress is up in the air at this point.

Luckily, them being masked hasn’t stopped people compiling lists of them and figuring out who’s who in videos of their abuses.

I’d rather see legislative and activist focus on the whereabouts of the people they take; making sure they’re safe is more important to me than knowing right now who disappeared them; that info can be gotten at any time, through many means (including ones they can’t erase, like bank transfers, healthcare benefit information, etc), when these Nazis are out of power.

4% of Democratic voters want to increase military spending.

70% of House Democrats just voted to increase military spending.

Most important quote from the article, imo.