Very good you’re close to the point. The destruction is a legal neccesity.

1. So the only scenario where your think makes sense if we have a seller with a book that is the only unit in existance and it is not digitized.
2. The bad thing about nazi book burnings was the targetting of the books of political enemies and jewish authors. This isn’t the case here. They destroy at most one copy of any book across the board.

the first person that actually speaks sense in this thread

How is this in any way comparable to that? The bad thing abt nazi book burning wasnt the destruction of physical copies of books, but the destruction of knowledge and their intent behind it