I don’t understand why they keep adding AI crap to everything. There can’t be a huge market of people who want it. It’s incredibly expensive to develop and run. Just from an economics point of view it doesn’t add up.

Is it just the corporate equivalent of FOMO? Wouldn’t it make more economic sense for them to release a base device that is capable of having AI apps/agents installed if and when the consumer wants it, rather than defaulting to it? Or are they so tightly bound in their own bubble that they don’t see the problem?

It’s like basic economic theory, has been thrown out the window; along with common sense.

Counter point: It won’t.

This is like being told you could win $100M when you’re handed a lottery ticket. There is a lot of weight on the word “could.”

Except in this case the lottery doesn’t exist, the ticket is a fake, and we’re all about to be screwed when the bubble bursts.

So, in a way, he’s right. A lot of white collar (and blue collar and no collar) jobs could be gone in 12 months, due to the AI bubble popping. Nice of him to put his name out there now so we know who’s to blame.