They were trying to argue that it was legally responsible for its own actions? Like, that it’s a person? And not even an employee at that? FFS

I’ve found it useful for a few things. I had had a song intermittently stuck in my head for a few years and had unsuccessfully googled it a few times. Couldn’t remember artist, name, lyrics (it was in a language I don’t speak) - and chatGPT got it in a couple of tries. Things that I’m too vague about to be able to construct a search prompt and want to explore. Stuff like that. I just don’t trust it with anything that I want actual facts for.

Nah, you can always come up with new combos. They could have named it ‘squonchy’ or ‘flurgled’, for example.