Site seems to be down.
- 0 Posts
- 6 Comments
False@lemmy.worldto
Linux@lemmy.ml•Why is Debian always left out of the distro recommendations?
1·3 days agoMy example applied to all distros, the difference would be the time it takes that code change (which resolved a critical to me bug) takes to actually be available to use.
There’s also very little that’s specific to me about that, it’s a real use case that comes up repeatedly for new releases that tend to push things graphically. I’m only going to recommend distros that minimize the time to get those fixes because it’s a better user experience for the target demographic with little downside.
False@lemmy.worldto
Linux@lemmy.ml•Why is Debian always left out of the distro recommendations?
5·3 days agoConsidering games are the most intensive things most people will use their computer for, I think it’s fine to optimize for that use case and assume everything else will be “fine”
False@lemmy.worldto
Linux@lemmy.ml•Why is Debian always left out of the distro recommendations?
6·3 days agoI’ve literally had to wait for fixes to hit new mesa versions to play newly released games. Having those packages be up to date is just going to be a better experience for people that care about that kind of stuff
Judging by their operations, they track them very poorly

Mesa has been the defacto standard for AMD for years. It’s always performed better than the official driver. AMD just made it their official recommendation recently.
I think Intel also uses Mesa, with Nvidia being the odd one out