Because of nuclear sharing which would never really happen anyway. But it’s a great way for the americans to say: “you got to buy our shit, we make sure nothing else is compatible”

You speak of lies and misinterpration and yet you say waste is a non-issue. And even low-level radiation waste (which is a lot of material if you tear down the whole plant at some point) has to be dealt with. Thats expensive and that’s part of the cost of nuclear energy. Even if the operators will try to push that to the taxpayer.

But yes, they are transparent. So much so, that even the operators publish lists of reasons about why they don’t want to build new plants or continue to run the existing ones:

German source

Without sinking to your level I will limit myself to say:
I am not the idiot here.

Nuclear … takes care of all of its waste

That could not be further from the truth.
There are temporary solutions for the waste at most.