

As I have said many times: license washing works both ways, this is the end of proprietary software as we know it, no more would I have a need to install a sketchy driver inside a windows VM just to use some crap USB microscope


As I have said many times: license washing works both ways, this is the end of proprietary software as we know it, no more would I have a need to install a sketchy driver inside a windows VM just to use some crap USB microscope


Yes, kinda expected it


POLL: Upvote for yes Downvote for No


you can do the opensource thing and fork it to remove the features you dont like.
also i have not looked at the src myself but its main purpose is use with local llms which can be reduced to mean: all your generated and collected data stays on your device.
true, but those people imo are the equivalent of script kiddies(vibe kiddies?)
check out the mario kart wii decomp
there are already decomp efforts of proprietary games that are accelerated thanks to LLMs, so yes
you know, license washing can work both ways
eh whatever I will humor you; why? why not have have a healthy discussion regarding this, this zero tolerance policy should be reserved for extreme content not thrown around willy nilly
What is fully human written and how are you as a human(I assume) able to distinguish between what is laboriously typed and what is generated, here lets try this exercise and see if you can spot any difference Here is a code I have typed by hand
"smash":
push rbp
mov rbp, rsp
call "smash"
pop rbp
ret
and here is machine generated code with the prompt, the slop machine used here is a compiler
GCC take this C code void smash(){smash();} and make it executable
and here is the output
"smash":
push rbp
mov rbp, rsp
call "smash"
nop
pop rbp
ret
please dont take this seriously
My mind is to ban it to preserve open source.
You will be preserving it alright, but not progressing it in anyway; A blanket ban wont really solve anything, a more sophisticated system would be a pinned comment warning of AI use, which you should eventually rescind if the author proves they have not abandoned the project when their tokens ran out
seema like concentrated effort to steer linux desktop in a certain direction