Why 2032?

Por que no los dos?

For some reason that made me think of the Subaru commercials. “They lived” when looking at a mangled car.

What point are they even trying to make? That France shouldn’t have been liberated from the Nazis?

Gross.

It actually doesn’t matter. Win by a little, and they’ll claim there was just enough fake votes. Win by a lot, and they’ll claim it was fake because you can’t win by that much.

I’ve blocked all .lm instances and even now piefed. The creator or piefed bans anyone who criticizes his dumb ass decisions. Well that’s fine, there a reason the entirety of piefed as a software has been decreasing population.

Also there are occasional mods that just love to jerk themselves. The dumb taco truck mod on the Star Trek instance will ban you if you say you don’t like new Star Trek, but that dumbass just moderates two mostly dead communities, so it’s okay

South Carolina is cheap as fuck and many likely are working from home. I have coworkers there. Sure they have no rights as humans, but maybe enough will start to sway elections.

As I said in another comment. If there is more than one charge the jury could find someone not guilty on one and guilty of another.

I view it as relevant to be a hate crime.

A lot of peace prize winners are war criminals and murders.

Correct, but often prosecution will have multiple charges. So they may have a Murder in x degree and manslaughter in x degree. Jury has to deliberate on each. It’s possible to be found not guilty for murder and guilty for manslaughter.

In court, both sides can submit something as evidence and the other side can object to it. It’s then up to the judge to sustain or overrule the objections. The jury is instructed to deliberate only on the items received by the court and any witness testimony, which again can have some answers or questions objected or struck from the record.

If the defense wanted to submit it then, it was objected, then the judge did make the call. However, the defense could also just be incompetent and left it out and decided to appeal based on that fact being left out.

Yes, but it still goes to trial which will require a new jury. It’s Memphis which is a city and by nature of random chance for jury selection shouldn’t be biased, like what a more rural country would be.

So there still a chance this could be a harsher sentence.

On the one hand a retrial makes sense because not all the facts of the case were presented to the jury.

On the other hand the prior conviction was manslaughter which is crazy lower for six shots and then just going home. Maybe the jury will see this as not only a hate crime, but also escalate to some form of murder charge.

Republicans never want to debate unless they get a good amount of propaganda out first.

But the money is flowing in a circle, will it ever truly run out?

Looks like Scooby and the gang solved another mystery.

I don’t know the details, but Lyft has teen, pink, and silver.

Same. My wife has told me there is a massive difference between going shopping and I just tag along and going by herself. Even in public areas, she just notices less stares and gets less random comments from men.