• Kalcifer@sh.itjust.worksOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    What’s interesting, and is confusing me about this, is that Ntfy does not adhere to this [1]. I’m not sure how this can be.

    References
    1. “End-to-end encryption (E2E) between clients (Android app, CLI, web app)”. binwiederhier. ntfy/binwiederhier. GitHub. Published: 2021-12-29T02:07:36Z. Accessed: 2024-11-22T05:04Z. https://github.com/binwiederhier/ntfy/issues/69.
    • rcbrk@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      It doesn’t matter. Even if the ntfy message was plaintext, that plaintext content would be a UnifiedPush “Push message” which is the RFC8291-encrypted raw POST data.

      • Kalcifer@sh.itjust.worksOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        So, for example, if one were to register Unified Push notifications with Matrix using Ntfy, the creation of the encrypted Unified Push notifications would be done by the Matrix Unified Push Gateway which then gets handed off to Ntfy? Is there a way to confirm that the received notification is indeed encrypted?