Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's attempts to revise fitness standards to put male and female soldiers on equal footing seem to have backfired, according to a new report. Last year, Hegseth introduced new sex-neutral fitness standards that sought to eliminate sex-based grading for combat soldiers on ...

Last year, Hegseth introduced new sex-neutral fitness standards that sought to eliminate sex-based grading for combat soldiers on the military’s physical fitness exam. That exam includes a 3-mile run, push-ups or pull-ups, and an abdominal plank. When the standards were announced, some analysts worried it could lead to fewer women enlisting.

But a new report from The War Horse, a nonprofit newsroom, suggests that Hegseth’s new standards were not making the military more masculine, as he seemed to hope. The report found that 90% of female Marines in combat roles who took the fitness test passed or exceeded expectations.

  • Nouvellalia@lemmy.world
    1443·
    2 days ago

    Because the women applying know they will be held to a much higher standard than the men, as always. So they are prepared.

    Bonus points to: knowing that they will have to fight off their fellow, extra rapey, enlisted counterparts.

    Edit: before I get the colic boys giving wojak tears

    On average, during the war in Afghanistan, 24% of active duty women and 1.9% of active duty men experienced sexual assault

    https://www.militarytimes.com/news/your-military/2024/08/19/military-sexual-assault-rate-higher-than-dod-estimates-report-finds/

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      3·
      12 hours ago

      This is why in any field I tend to have more confidence in anyone that goes against the stereotype, because it is more likely they really wanted to do it and likely worked harder to get there.

      If someone likely were told every five minutes “you should be a doctor” becomes a doctor they are potentially there just because they are “supposed to”. If conversely they get told they should consider a different career every step of the way and still gets to be a doctor, now that person had some drive.

    • velma@sh.itjust.worksOP
      71·
      2 days ago

      You’re exactly right:

      Women in the Army Are More Likely to Be Killed by Fellow Soldiers Than Enemy Combatants

      A first-of-its-kind analysis by The Intercept found that in the Army, women are more likely to be killed by their fellow service members than by enemy combatants, in a reversal of the threat soldiers are trained to face. Between 2011 and August 2025, at least 41 women died by homicide in the Army — more than half of them at the hands of other service members or veterans. Using Defense Department manpower data to calculate per capita death rates, The Intercept found that active-duty Army women face a higher risk of homicide than male soldiers, the opposite of national and global trends.

      In many cases, women in the Army are killed by current or former romantic partners. Over 70 percent of victims had an intimate relationship with the perpetrator at one point, and the rate of homicides among women soldiers from intimate partner violence is at least three times higher than the national average.

      • 🇨🇦GreenBeard🇨🇦@lemmy.caEnglish
        11·
        2 days ago

        I do wonder how that compares to the DV rates for Law Enforcement. I would tend to assume it’s a bit worse among LEOs actually. Armed forces tend to draw from a slightly wider pool, with the more… enthusiastic ending up in law enforcement after discharge.