• Atomic@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      He’s not taking a “both sides are bad” take. He’s taking a “I don’t want to deal with politics, I just want to perform”.

      • wittymcusername@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Going back a few days to Ed’s original statement:

        “I am appalled by the conflict between Israel and Palestine. The suffering and pain caused on both sides is a human tragedy,” begins Sheeran in an Instagram post.

        It’s at least a little bit of a “both sides are bad” take.

      • HCSOThrowaway@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        23 hours ago

        But then why ban Macklemore unless he suspected Macklemore would’ve gone on a political rant?

        Regardless, not using your platform to advocate for people without a platform is a form of complicity.

        • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          But then why ban Macklemore unless he suspected Macklemore would’ve gone on a political rant?

          He wasn’t banned ahead of going on a “political rant”, he was removed after. So I don’t know what you’re on about there.

          Regardless, not using your platform to advocate for people without a platform is a form of complicity.

          That is highly debatable. I heard no one go on a “political rant” about the various internal conflicts in Africa. Are they complicit in those because of that? If an artist just wants to do their art. I say fair enough. I strongly disagree that it’s a form of complicity