“The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is now only counting costs to businesses when considering regulation on key pollutants, internal documents show, rather than considering human lives saved by such caps.”

  • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 hours ago

    EPA exists only to save human lives/illness. Protecting the commons as well as private victims. It should exist for that function.

    Headline is saying EPA should no longer exist, if all rules that protect people will be removed.

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Life is cheap. Profit is the God we pray to, no matter what anyone else tells you. This goes beyond left or right and democrat or republican. It’s a corporation/billionaire thing. And they’re currently winning.

    • Allero@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      This goes beyond American left, which is to say no left at all.

      The actual left is 100% anti-corporation and anti-billionaire.

  • r1veRRR@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Don’t Lives Lost also impose costs and lost revenue on businesses? Even from a business standpoint, killing a bunch of people is bad for business.

    • Talcosis@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Those costs can be passed onto governments. Much like salary subsidies in the form of food stamps.

      The corporate world is doing a PE style takeover of government, and non-workers are simply an externality.

    • multifariace@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 hours ago

      You’re right. I have been trying to rationalize the simplicity of Captain Planet villains to make the show relevant enough to make a new live action series. Our capitalistic overlords may have opened up the story line.

    • Kwiila@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      One of the noted traits required to build incredible amounts of wealth is that they would rather die on top watching the world burn, than save the world from burning and lose wealth/status/rank.

    • friend_of_satan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Seriously. Human lives or not, how is not considering pollution protecting the environment? Humans are not the only living things in the environment.

        • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Yeah but before that they have their private islands and valleys that they keep pristine so they and only they can go do stuff in it. They turn into environmentalists overnight when talking about the land they play in. Mostly shooting animals, but some light atving also.

  • Cort@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    20 hours ago

    So they’re going to include the costs my business has to pay for increased health and life insurance premiums?

    • thingAmaBob@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Would that actually work? I don’t know much about how well funded the Russian government is, but from the small amount of knowledge I have, it doesn’t seem as if they have much power themselves to take on another country (at least long term). They’re already using their resources for Ukraine.

      This current administration is so incompetent, evil, and or delusional, that whatever plans they may have, they just won’t work out in the end long term. Unfortunately, too many people could die and many more may suffer if things get too far. Hell, even if we all suddenly mobilize today, painful sacrifices will need to be made; either direction will suck. We’ll just have to choose which “suck” we’d rather live with.