When women riders and drivers told us they wanted more control over how they ride and earn, we listened. That feedback led to Women Preferences, features designed to give women the choice to ride with other women. Since our first pilots last summer, we’ve heard just how much that choice matters—from feeling more comfortable in the back seat to more confident behind the wheel.

      • artyom@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        3 days ago

        It’s not that complicated roflcopter. I don’t know how to break it down any further.

        Why would you think anyone wants to be a victim?

        • Wammityblam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          3 days ago

          Because you’re bending over backwards to try to show men as the victims of rampant sexual harassment when it overwhelmingly occurs to women.

          Men are not being victimized here, women are just getting relief

          • Bluegrass_Addict@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            men are being victimized.

            'he raped me! ’

            those words to a cop can essentially suspend a man’s life for an indeterminate amount of time. does it happen where men rape women? yeah, and it’s fucked… do some women use it as a weapon to get back at someone/ruin someone’s life? you bet your ass they do…

            why can’t it be fair? why should a guy be forced to potentially endure that scenario when they hailed a cab…when the system is in place to protect 1 gender by giving choice. it’s not limiting her use of it or making it worse for her, it’s making it better for ALL that use the service.

            stop thinking because one issue if objectively worse then the other, that the other should be dismissed. that’s horrible logic, heck it’s not even logic. it’s just stupid.

            • Wammityblam@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              'he raped me! ’

              those words to a cop can essentially suspend a man’s life for an indeterminate amount of time. does it happen where men rape women? yeah, and it’s fucked… do some women use it as a weapon to get back at someone/ruin someone’s life? you bet your ass they do…

              Do you have any evidence at all that this happens even semi-regularly?

              why can’t it be fair? why should a guy be forced to potentially endure that scenario when they hailed a cab

              Because it doesn’t happen anywhere near as regularly as you’re trying to make it sound.

              • Bluegrass_Addict@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                once is more then enough… it doesn’t need to happen regularly.

                what’s your magic number threshold where an issue starts to matter…? clearly that’s what you’re getting at so I wanna know this magic number

                equality is and should be everyone’s goals. if not, then might as well call free for all and never have special rules for anyone based on anything. society is about inclusion and equality, yet you only seem to want equality is specific scenarios. makes no sense… why half implement a rule when fully implementing it won’t have any effect on the first half? why not accessable to all…you’re just arguing for the sake of it.

                  • Bluegrass_Addict@lemmy.ca
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    2 days ago

                    exactly. why argue about equality for all on scenarios that are differing in terms of frequency, but still happen regardless of how often. women get assaulted and should be protected by allowing for choice, and men get falsely accused and should be protected by allowing for choice.

                    me = equality and choices for all

                    you = but women experience it worse, and it doesn’t happen as frequent for men so men shouldn’t have the same safety nets as women. (not equality)

          • artyom@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            I didn’t even so much as suggest that they were victims of any sexual assault at all, much less “rampant” . You just made all of that up.

              • artyom@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                3 days ago

                LOL sorry your attempts at gaslighting were unsuccessful, I guess? Better luck next time.