Never seen one to address the amount of externals they send your data to. Could be a EU thing?

  • warm@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 day ago

    Isn’t there supposed to be a one click disagree to all button, legally? Or did I misunderstand that law?

    • bertlewirth@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’d like to think that there’s a disagree button in the “more” button, but I’m not holding my breath. As an aside, I’ve seen some (Guardian, for example) that let you disagree IF you subscribe for money. Pretty sure that’s gotta be illegal.

      • tae glas [siad/iad]@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        usually, that format involves toggling off every single one of their third party partners, and then a separate toggle is further down for each one’s “legitimate use” or something.

        they’re clearly hoping that by making it incredibly time-consuming to go through every option, that most people would give in and accept all.

        i don’t think that’s supposed to be allowed under GDPR, but making complaints is also time-consuming. i’d rather just leave those sites immediately after seeing there’s no “reject all” and make a mental note that their stinky site is unusable 🤷

    • artyom@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      I think it’s regional. Often you’ll see “necessary only” which, who knows what they consider “necessary”. If you have a adblocker, there’s typically a list for “cookie annoyances” you need to enable for some reason. If that doesn’t work you can always use the element picker, although that sometimes breaks the site. If that happens I just leave.