Much credit to this post.

  • SinAdjetivos@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    LMAO at the amount of “her entire career has been about building and filling internment camps, but at least she doesn’t have the popular support for a coup!” in this thread.

    • Mambert@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      A federal prosecutor has always dedicated her career to building “internment camps” but a literal coup that led to several deaths was “soft”?

      • SinAdjetivos@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Several deaths:

        six people died: one was shot by Capitol Police, another died of a drug overdose, three died of natural causes, and a police officer died after being assaulted by rioters.

        I’ll admit it may technically be a mischaracterization, but I don’t think you understand the level of violence that is typical of “hard” coups.

        • Mambert@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          I just disagree with softening the word by adding “soft” at the beginning. A soft coup is a coup. Date rape is still rape, candy-corn-murder is still murder. No need to add prefixes to try and categorize them, and artificially make some sort of hierarchy.

          By naming it any less than a coup, and holding all coups to the same standard, it’s an attempt to soften it, and I am against that.