• Wolf314159@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    That was notably a line about wearing used fur, not sourcing new fur for new clothes. I think that is an important distinction when evaluating the moral arguments against wearing fur. Still totally valid to be against any fur clothing, but that line feels a lot less immoral to me in context.

    • bedwyr@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Wearing is popularizing.

      I am so over that in favour of his standing up for what’s right. But that line wasn’t cool, not to my sensibilities, but I’ve seen footage of trapped animals and it is heart rending. And these fur farms in denmark are fucking disgusting too.

      • Wolf314159@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        It was a song about thrifting. A song against fast fashion, consumerism, and satirizing displays of wealth. That’s what it was popularizing. It was a line about making the most out of the lot we’re given. It was not a song glorifying the wearing of fur. Fur is poetic shorthand for wealth. You can’t excise a single word or line from a song or poem from it’s context. And if you’d actually listened to the song or watched the video, it’d have been pretty clear that no one wearing gator boots or or mink was cool. It was satire. The line about mink even says that it smells like piss.