Major releases still coming out, and enthusiasts collecting discs.

  • cabbage@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Am I wrong to feel like Blu-ray was always something for the enthusiasts?

    DVDs were good enough for most people, Blu-ray was more expensive and it didn’t feel like it ever dominated the market before streaming took over. I often see impressive DVD collections, I rarely see more than a handful of Blu-rays anywhere.

    • BlackVenom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      For enthusiasts? No. But they were significantly more expensive and it just about took one to justify the price difference. Today there’s obviously a price difference but nowhere near as significant - uhd bd took that place. They never became the default like DVD did - where every PC has a player and things beyond movies (ignoring PS3 games) shipped on BD… So usage was obviously contingent on ownership of a player - outside of the PS3, that was a specialty device… And expensive. In its early years, <=720p tvs, fuzzy plasma, and dlp projectors were still commonplace. IMO it’s biggest failure was being ahead of its time. Today I have no idea why one would buy a DVD over a BD… But both have or are losing to streaming and soon we’ll own nothing.

      • e0qdk@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Today I have no idea why one would buy a DVD over a BD

        Having bought multiple DVDs (in combo packs with Blu-Ray) in the past year, it’s because, unlike Blu-Ray, they actually fucking play reliably on my computer. Blu-Ray is about 50/50 IME. (Entirely the fault of the DRM – not the physical material.)