Half the point of the article is that museums are not very good at keeping (and making publically available) records of their human remians. If even 1% of those 37,000 are full cadavers kept in a way sacreligious to a living culture I’d still call those 370 people a “vast scale”. Would you let it slide to learn another country held 370 British corpses as exhibits?
Half the point of the article is that museums are not very good at keeping (and making publically available) records of their human remians. If even 1% of those 37,000 are full cadavers kept in a way sacreligious to a living culture I’d still call those 370 people a “vast scale”. Would you let it slide to learn another country held 370 British corpses as exhibits?