• PattyMcB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 hour ago

    the agency has in recent years spent too much time on Washington controversies.

    I know for a fact they used to spend a LOT of resources catching pedophiles. Are those the “controversies” perhaps?

  • kreskin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I’m not making an account on musks shitty fake social network. Hey Patel, you are a complete idiot.

    Heres the old IQ scale so you can reference what that means.

    Moron: IQ of 50–69 (mild impairment) Imbecile: IQ of 20–49 (moderate to severe impairment) Idiot: IQ below 20 (profound impairment)

    http://www.assessmentpsychology.com/iqclassifications.htm

    And any FBI agents who come to my house better bring a signed warrant or you’ll simply be trespassed and told to go fuck yourselves.

  • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Imagine growing up knowing you wanted to be in the FBI to be part of a crack team working on real crimes and then…getting assigned a task like this?

    I mean, what the fuck?

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I imagine half the people who grow up wanting to be in the FBI would have been caught up in the propaganda/entertainment shows like 24 growing up. The run around shoot bad guys and stop nuclear bombs from being snuck into the country before they blow up (insert large city here). Unless they were really into forensics and like lab work, but there can’t be to many people out there that love science and think the FBI would be the best place to study/learn cool new things

  • resipsaloquitur@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Revelations in November 2025 that Mr Patel, 46, was using taxpayer-funded jets to watch performances by his girlfriend, Alexis Wilkins, a 27-year-old country music singer, also prompted widespread criticism.

    Fails the half-his-age-plus-seven rule.

      • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        58 minutes ago

        Hey mods, I didn’t direct the r-word at anyone, specifically mentioned that it’s offensive, and suggested the alternative and legally defensible term googly-eyed chud. I think the automod needs to calm down a bit.

        • Isaac (ieh)@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          28 minutes ago

          I wasn’t the one who did it, and personally, I think it could have gone either way, but while I don’t think I would have removed that one, I certainly would not argue against its removal. I don’t think the moderator needs to calm down at all. A ban for that comment might’ve been rather much, but a simple removal is perfectly fine.

      • BillyClark@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        7 hours ago

        “His partner’s eyes must be even more fucked than his.”

        (apologies for stealing this joke from Romesh Ranganathan)

  • s@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    8 hours ago

    My first read of this headline was that Patel’s orders were for the agents to call him that

        • Mulligrubs@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          38 minutes ago

          How long has the Special Olympics been in charge of what words are appropriate, anyway?

          Why humor them? Believe me, the word itself will outlive the Special Olympics.

          • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            26 minutes ago

            FTA:

            "The R-Word Is a Form of Bullying

            Kantar reviewed nearly 50 million social posts in the U.S. over 2 years. Over two-thirds of posts about people with intellectual disabilities were negative and nearly 29 million contained slurs (i.e., using the word “retard(ed)” or other words combined with “-tard”).

            Spreading the R-word continues to hurt people with intellectual disabilities—and whether intended or not, is a form of bullying. Using the R-word is the same as using any slur against a minority group. Eliminating this word is a step toward respect for all. "

          • Isaac (ieh)@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            26 minutes ago

            You think linking to one particular source that tries to explain the problem means they’re in charge?

            Well, I guess Lemmy bows to that organization considering it’s in the Lemmy TOS: https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

            You don’t have to like the rules, but you certainly have to follow them.

        • SailorFuzz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          46 minutes ago

          why did we pick this word? Why is moron, imbecile, idiot, etc… all of those are perfectly a-okay as an insult and no one gets their panties in a bunch. Feels arbitrary.

          Feels more like a empty issue to take up arms for so that people can FEEL like they’re doing something, while doing next to nothing. It’s so easy to word police, it’s hard to read up on social causes and systems of oppression. So, instead you get armchair keyboard warriors going “you can’t say that!!!” and feel like they’re making a difference… it’s a lazy cause to pacify people, artificially inflated. On the same wavelength as latinx.

          • Isaac (ieh)@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            19 minutes ago

            If words mean nothing, I suggest trying that theory out by going up to a person of colour and using a certain word to them. Or even call them “colored”, which used to be the preferred term.

            So if words mean something, perhaps it’s worth the time to consider their use carefully.

            • SailorFuzz@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              14 minutes ago

              yes those are exactly comparable. Definitely no difference in historical context at all… pat yourself on the back, you’re antibullying saviour!

              • Isaac (ieh)@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                12 minutes ago

                pat yourself on the back, you’re antibullying saviour!

                Do you pat yourself on the back for standing up against bigotry? I would think it’s the human thing to do.

                • SailorFuzz@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  7 minutes ago

                  Yea, but you’re not actually doing anything effective.

                  Are you helping real people, or just helping yourself? Because tone policing a word when it isn’t even being used as slur at a person, but doing it just because you want everyone to know how anti-bullying, anti-bigotry you are… sorry, that’s just self-congratulatory masturbation. And look, I get it, sometimes it feels good to wax poetic in public, I’m just saying, maybe be honest about why you’re doing it.

          • chunkystyles@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            39 minutes ago

            Because that’s how language works. That word has been used to demean, mock, belittle, and cause real trauma to people. That’s why using it makes people feel bad, and as sentient, empathetic people, we choose not to use it.

            • SailorFuzz@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              29 minutes ago

              yea… but so have all those other words too.

              Somehow it was decided that one word would be the nono bad word… when literally all of them are used interchangably. But, you only get scolded if you say one of them. And policing its use does make any actual meaningful change. Like, if you wanted to insult a handicapped person, you can still do it using any of other words in the quiver.

          • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            26 minutes ago

            FTA:

            "The R-Word Is a Form of Bullying

            Kantar reviewed nearly 50 million social posts in the U.S. over 2 years. Over two-thirds of posts about people with intellectual disabilities were negative and nearly 29 million contained slurs (i.e., using the word “retard(ed)” or other words combined with “-tard”).

            Spreading the R-word continues to hurt people with intellectual disabilities—and whether intended or not, is a form of bullying. Using the R-word is the same as using any slur against a minority group. Eliminating this word is a step toward respect for all."

            • SailorFuzz@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              17 minutes ago

              it’s a lazy virtue signal so that we eat our own. Likely propagated by right-wing groups who benefit the most from the infighting. It doesn’t solve a real issue and instead is just another purity test imposed to artificially create division.

              But go off, feel good about yourself, you’ve done it, you solved bullying!

          • Mulligrubs@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            36 minutes ago

            They also don’t like the word mongoloid, and prefer that you don’t say “suffers from …” and more.

            People humor them, because… you know

    • 🌞 Alexander Daychilde 🌞@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      No.

      My wife used to teach adults with cognitive and developmental disabilities. They learned Shakespeare.

      The reason the term “mental retardation” came into being was to indicate a slowness of learning. And while it’s a complicated topic, it’s arguably true that many of them do learn some things more slowly.

      But they absolutely learn.

      They know the term “retard” and know it applies to them. They feel pain knowing that it is used.

      And it’s unfair. When I say they learned Shakespeare - upon more than one occasion I saw her class discussing the topic intelligently and with full understanding.

      There are plenty of other words people can use that don’t have the same harm.

      And yes, some will say “other words used to be like that and aren’t”. Great! Use them! "Colored’ used to be the preferred term for people who are Black, but I’d love to sit by and watch you call someone that.