• wheezy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      The UN in theory maybe. But an institution that allows an illegal trade embargo to continue 33 years in a row (longer before votes on it even began) because “special vetos” are more important than human rights. Yeah. Fuck that.

      Like, the idea of what a “United nations” might be in the average westerners head. Sure. But, that’s not what the UN is at all. The UN exists to create a hierarchy that exists to uphold the American empire and it’s capital interest. So, I’d start over from the drawing board.

      Edit: Cuba trade embargo if it wasn’t obvious.

      • nymnympseudonym@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        23 hours ago

        The problem with a monopoly is that it tends to abuse its position, no matter the intentions of the people in it.

        Multipolarity with international rules that are followed out of self-interest because conflict is more costly than cooperation. That’s about the best equilibrium we can hope for. Until we have O’Neill cylinders, ofc .