This is a likely scenario in the second round according to polls.

The election is in 10 days.

      • matlag@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        17 hours ago

        A website was put up to track all the cases in which sehe’s investigated, because yes, we needed that!

        https://wikidati.fr/

        She’s investigated for corruption (several different and independent cases), using public money to pay her personal lawyer, she abuses procedures to shut up journalists (that one is now legal but doesn’t make you a less shitty person) and others.

        Oh, and she faked her resume to get in a prestigious university-like institution.

  • Synapse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    24 hours ago

    This poll comissioned by Le Parisien and Sud Radio, might be a little tiny bit biased in favor of Dati. I very highly doubt that a 3rd of Parisiens when to vote for her.

    • MessyAdvent@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 day ago

      Welp, once again, it seems it’s a bit biased.

      Dati is very much right leaning, and very much under investogation too.
      Her lawyer made a website shutdown that was listing all her cases.

      Chikirou is trully such a strange choice. Even tho LFI IS left leaning (far from being tankies tho), Chikirou is… An anomaly ? She has been caught doing homophobe comments, and lately, has made a very strange comment about people not wanting to work 50 hours a week…

      I’m not Parisian myself, and if I were to vote acording to my values, the party that would represent it better would be LFI (but not Chijirou, so tough choice), but the “best scenario” would be for Gregoire to be elected.

      • Valnao@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        15 hours ago

        Even tho LFI IS left leaning (far from being tankies tho),

        In 2022, Finland 🇫🇮 and Sweden 🇸🇪, requested to join NATO due to threats from Russia.

        It required a vote in the French Parliament.

        Every political party voted “Yes”. Except two:

        🔴 Rassemblement National: Abstention.

        🔴 LFI: Against.

        https://datan.fr/votes/legislature-16/vote_184

        • unknowing8343@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          22 hours ago

          After all these things that are happening, if you still consider that anyone becoming a military slave to USA is a good idea… I don’t know what to tell you.

          Those countries are already EU countries. Russia will not dare to touch them. And if they do, then being in or out of NATO would become the smallest of our problems at that point.

          • matlag@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            17 hours ago

            A EU real defence policy would be better, but countries under immediate threats (3–4 years away) curiously lack that patience.

            So until we have a real credible alternative to NATO, this is the only alliance available! NATO is not just about promises of mutual help. It includes military cooperation, joined exercises, etc. so that if shit hits the fan, allied military are ready to fight together in an integrated framework.

            And that does not prevent NATO members from purchasing non-US equipment, which is what the EU has put up as a policy. France is actually a very good proof of that.

      • Deme@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Huh, either I’m completely blind or then op edited the picture 15 minutes ago.

  • bryndos@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    I thought i’d heard the local arrodissement populace had a lot of say over what happens in their neighborhood?

    That was given as a reason Paris could reduce cars much faster than many cities , as Paris seems less dominated by the median suburban voter.

    It’s shite if that 's not true. Paris seems so chill these days; at least in contrast to 20 years ago.

    So what exactly are these elections for? Can they really go to an arondissement and remove all the pro-pedestrian stuff? Is that in their power - if the residents don’t want it.

    • zaphod@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      AFAIK the arrondissement councils don’t have much power. The reason usually given why Paris was able to reduce cars much faster is that there aren’t really any suburbs in Paris, they’re all outside and therefore have no vote. And Paris voted for a mayor with the political will to actually kick out the cars. I’m not up to date on why they’re now shifting towards the right, might just be the general trend in the world.

    • No_Maines_Land@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Montreal’s arrodissement system/controls also greatly benefited it’s cycling growth.

      Though the suburbs that are part of la ville de Montréal are gerenally less cars brained than suburbs that are not part of la vdm. So that is probably a big factor. That said, the biggest suburbs (and the ones directly north and south of la vdm) are putting big effort into their active and public transit; so maybe not.

  • NewOldGuard@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    Ah fuck off with your LFI slander, standing by social liberals will do nothing but perpetuate the system as it exists