• queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Selling tools that kill people, knowing that they are dangerous, should have consequences.

      Would the world really be a worse place if Sam Altman were tried for murder? What’s the problem?

        • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          I’m losing patience. I’m obviously fucking not talking about regular fucking objects, a knife doesn’t fucking talk and convince you to kill yourself. There’s an obvious categorical difference between objects, and tools designed to trick you into thinking they’re intelligent. It’s murder. Someone needs to face consequences.

          Why would it be bad if Sam Altman went to prison? Would the world be a worse place? Why are you protecting him?

            • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              A knife doesn’t pretend to be your friend and convince you to sever your arteries. Categorically different.

              Answer my question. Why would it be bad for Sam Altman to be tried for murder? If we decided that the owners of AI companies were culpable for the behavior of their chatbots and the consequences of their actions, wouldn’t that solve the problem?

              • Tja@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                Categorically different, one kills you, the other just talks. (it doesn’t talk, but I’ll humor you)