• Don Piano@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    They need to lose their licenses.

    Everyone anywhere using one on the job should be fired, but medical personnel is endangering people.

    • The Yungest Onion@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      ‘Everyone anywhere’? That’s an amazingly broad statement. What’re you defining as ‘using one’? If I use ChatGPT to rewrite a paragraph, should I be fired? What about if a non native speaker uses it to remove grammatical errors from an email, should they be fired? How about using it for assisting with coding errors? Or generating draft product marketing copy? Or summarising content for third parties to make it easier to understand? Still a fireable offence? How about generating insights from data? Assistance with Roadmap prioritisation? Generating summaries of meeting notes or presentations? Helping users with learning disabilities understand complex information? Or helping them with letters, emails etc? How about if it use it to remind me of tasks? Or managing my routines?

      • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Don’t you be bringing nuance into this.

        If you used an LLM to find that mistyped variable name, you deserve to lose your job. You and your family must suffer.

        If you are blind and you use a screen reader with some AI features, you should be fired and that tech needs to be taken from you. You must suffer. Should think twice before being blind, you disabled fuck.

        Honestly we should just kill them, even. In a very painful and torturous way. AI bad.

        • Mrkawfee@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          There’s a difference between using LLMs to edit text, provide ideas or give you information that you can double check because you have the subject matter experience. Relying on it as a substitute for skill when something important is at stake like someone’s well being is reckless at best.

          • The Yungest Onion@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            Sure, but the original quote was:

            Everyone anywhere using one on the job should be fired

            There’s no nuance there it’s just AI = bad. I agree that it’s shouldn’t, in its current form, be used as a substitute for skill in important situations. You’re totally right there.

            • Don Piano@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 years ago

              I never said AI = bad. AI is much broader and contains worthwhile and non-plagiarized approaches.

              If it’s worth doing, do it properly.

              • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 years ago

                No you did say that.

                Everyone anywhere using one on the job should be fired

                You said anyone using an AI in any capacity should be fired. I have heard infinitely better takes from 4-year-olds and why they need more ice cream.

                • Don Piano@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  This is on a post about chatgpt use. Chatgpt is from the set of llms, which is a subset of ai.

                  Ai is cool. The current batch of LLMs/PISS can leave.