This is the first time I’ve come across genuine AI janky slop trying to do something productive. Really annoying.

  • TwilightKiddy@scribe.disroot.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Have you tried just

    cjxl test.png test.jxl -d 0 -e 9
    

    instead of relying on third party websites?

    It is part of libjxl which you should be able to get on on any modern Linux distribution or even on Windows without any issues.

    • jaykrown@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yea that worked thanks. I did this

      cjxl test.jpeg test_small.jxl --lossless_jpeg=0 -d 2.0 -e 9

      and I got even lower from 931.1 kB on a jpeg to 121.4 kB and the compression is barely noticable.

  • kibblebits@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    3 days ago

    I love how anti-ai people are so ignorant about what is and is not ai.

    Yall think an if then statement is ai.

    • Alexstarfire@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 days ago

      I was trying to figure the AI portion of this as well. Maybe it was AI coded, but I have no way of knowing that from this pic.

      • kibblebits@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 days ago

        It’s just one of the many many online image processors that are likely to be using imagemagick. Heck, nearly all of them are just old PHP sites.

        I think the anti-ai people are getting so delusional they think any Software that doesn’t work how they want it to must be AI and not just a shitty developer or… In most cases, a shitty user.

  • _g_be@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 days ago

    Convertico as a website has existed long before AI.

    Just because PNG to jpeg XL is inefficient doesn’t mean it’s AI.

    • TwilightKiddy@scribe.disroot.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s not even that, PNG to lossless JXL is actually stupidly efficient if we are speaking pure file size. Either the website is doing something wrong or it’s some weird edge case.