• orioler25@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    5 hours ago

    “We.” Always a red flag when someone admits to participating in lolcow shit; buncha chuds bullying autistic kids online.

    • Saledovil@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      4 hours ago

      The human brain doesn’t fully develop until the mid twenties, and empathy is one of the last things that fully develops. So the nihilistic online edge lord culture is one you can genuinely age out of.

    • St.Elsewhere@threads.net@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I think you underestimate how long the term has been around, and I’ve hidden nothing. I accept the shitty person I was. Have you confronted your deficiencies as a human being?

      • orioler25@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I know how long the term has been around bud, we haven’t even had this internet shit fifty years for fuck’s sake. If you accept the shitty person you “were,” why did you just produce a cruel estimation of some other person online just because you found their behaviour cringe again? This is the kind of “acceptance” people adopt when they feel guilt but don’t want to change. It’s also so telling to write off actual malice and cruelty in such a fundamental way as “well we all do had things.” No, I’ve never had the inclination to treat a vulnerable person badly, go figure.

        And lol, lmao, yes. Which is how I can see straight through this kind of bullshit.

        • I want to congratulate you for having a normal upbringing, then. I’m not going to offer anything identifying, because I’m not an idiot, but I grew up surrounded by corpses and continued to develop elsewhere in a state of nihilism and rage bred by a family, myself included, in the throes of constantly triggered ptsd. You do not understand enough to judge an internet stranger by their arbitrary admissions. Your scope of understanding is limited by the offense you’ve taken and your frame of reference.

          And It’s not just “cringe.” It’s an extreme social trespass and transgression to, and follow me on this, tell someone to break up with their partner because of an llm’s estimation of your desires. Whether satire or not, this person fits within the fringe groups. I’d otherwise call them an incel, but they seem particularly unhinged. Which pejorative do you prefer for a person who parasocially adheres to someone and decides upon their future? This is like defending pedophiles under the umbrella of lgbtq.