• Redditmodstouchgrass@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Tell me you’ve never had kids, blah blah. Toddlers run around naked all the time, and NORMAL parents don’t think of it in a sexual context, they see their kid being cute and grab the camera.

    • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      This is true but having had to go through the many file boxes of a local pedophile to see if he had any of children in our building I can tell you that those pictures make it into many grubby hands, where they take on a whole different connotation. And this was even back in the day when you sent film to be developed. Now you have to expect that they will make it out to the world through the Internet.

    • gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      You’re describing “NORMAL” behavior from a generation ago. You are right that people up thru the 90s would act that way, but Michael Jackson news and Catholic Church scandals made this a lot less socially acceptable over the last 3 decades or so.

      • Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        What does socially acceptable mean? This is occurring in the privacy of one’s home, not the grocery store.

        Even in the 90s it was not socially acceptable for a toddler to be naked in public.

        • gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          No, but taking pictures of your own kids when they were naked at home for your private family album was more socially acceptable then