• hitmyspot@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    29
    ·
    1 day ago

    I hope my ai agent can learn what I like and give me suitable recommendations based on that.

    Part if why ai is so overvalued is companies don’t value my time. Slop won’t fix that. I’m hooeful that ai agents allow us to filter out the junk we don’t want. No more waiting on hold. No made searching online for deals and product reviews. Just agents parsing data that we want.

    For entertainment, there was a shift when we moved from broadcast to digital as we could binge and not miss episodes. The rise of reality TV muddied the waters of quality and was the equivalent of ai slop. However those that preferred, avoided it.

    Of course that won’t be automatic. We’re going to need open models, open training data and a great FOSS ecosystem around personal agents. We also need to make sure that the means of compute don’t fall out of people’s hands.

    • OwOarchist@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      24 hours ago

      I hope my ai agent can learn what I like and give me suitable recommendations based on that.

      lol, no. It will learn what you like, sell that information to advertisers and governments, and then give you recommendations based on what the AI’s billionaire owners want you to watch.

      • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Yes, with openai, or Google. That’s why I hope we can move more to FOSS agents. Currently, big tech uses our data against us to try and manipulate us.

        With big data processing being more available, things like price checking and review checking can be automated. The problem is its always cat and mouse. Browser extensions started by finding you discount codes and automatically entering them. Then they started to mine your data and swap referral codes to theirs as they enshittified.

        LLM’s are here to stay nut they are not groundbreaking in the way businesses hope, replacing workers. They are useful in replacing tasks. They are just not consistently good at those tasks. They shift the cognitive effort in many cases. Well, we should use them to shift the effort back onto corporations.

      • psx_crab@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        23 hours ago

        That’s what i told my friend when they mentioned that their clanker recommended the most expensive stuff when asked. Sure, the top result from google will be given the priority, but when parameters can sneakily be adjusted to favour people who paid them, then we will never know what being recommended is an ad or not.

    • chaosCruiser@futurology.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Oh boy, did that rub everyone the wrong way.

      Either way, you could have your own LLM agent and run it locally. That way your recommendations wouldn’t be steered towards greatest quarterly revenue. Instead, it would be something that actually serves your purposes.

      • Salvo@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Or even better, don’t be lazy and curate your own interests.

        My high school motto was “Faber Quisque Fortunae” (each man creates their own destiny). That means that You need to take responsibility for your own actions and decisions. You don’t outsource living.

        • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Curating your own interests involves some aapect of information seeking. Llms can be used for that. It’s not a case that anyone should trust ai to make a decision. It’s that ai can help surface information to allow them to make a decision. The problem is too many people are letting the ai make a decision for them, or using it instead of other information that is better.

          • Salvo@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Most of the raw information has been deliberately obfuscated in with malicious ads.

            If we were able to dismantle the toxic malicious web advertising apparatus, we wouldn’t need them. At all!

      • ThirdConsul@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        Either way, you could have your own LLM agent and run it locally

        Ignoring everything else, that wouldn’t work. Your local llm instance, to recommend you new movies, would have to scour the internet to summarize information about them.

        Boom, thats the vector of it getting steered towards greatest quarterly revenue.

        • chaosCruiser@futurology.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          24 hours ago

          Yeah that’s true. Search results, movie reviews and blogs definitely can be used to steer it in any direction. You just need to keep the LLM on a very short leash and keep a close eye on its diet. Takes some effort to do this properly.

          • ThirdConsul@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            14 hours ago

            That defeats the purpose then.

            If the goal is to say “hi, my local LLM, recommend me a new movie that I like, because god forbid I’ll take a risk and grow”, then you having to curate the data feed going into LLM to describe new movies is in practice this:

            • you’ll have to find sources of data (websites, threads, communicties)
            • verify each and everyone for poisoning BEFORE adding to your deterministic vectorization (see what Netflix did for recommendation algorithm recently) and applying custom LLM-like in architecture model.

            Tl;dr;

            Either you can use LLM and will be steered towards greatest quarterly revenue OR you have to put the same effort as if reading all reviews from multiple sources by yourself

            And in both cases you still end up with the same outcome “maybe you’ll like it” :P

            • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 hours ago

              Unless there are community based information sources. Adblock works mainly by blacklisting. Foss agents could use a combination of blacklisting and whitelisting in the same way. Yes, it takes effort, but spread over a community, it’s minimal. In the days before internet, it meant buying a magazine or newspaper. There has always been a certain amount of effort to find reviews, other than word of mouth, which will continue.