• artyom@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Its not sus. They’re just hyper-aware of security. And Aurora is just not terribly secure. Its just that you’re now choosing between privacy and maximum security. And I prioritize privacy, personally.

    They pretty much only recommend Accrescent.

    • vas@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I agree. Specifically, it’s privacy AND freedom (free software development model).

      If these two are against maximum security, GrapheneOS consistently chooses security. Which is unfortunate for me, because I would consistently choose freedom. (Especially due to long-term considerations.)

      • Cleisthenian@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        14 hours ago

        You can disregard their recommendation if you wish, I do sometimes. If they were here, I imagine they’d say they don’t see privacy and security as contradicting each other, just that there are different threat models. I think they subscribe to the idea that not everyone is going to be sufficiently informed in order to make a rational judgement, so instead they default to lowering potential risk. They do value accessibility for the tech illiterate as well.

    • furry toaster@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      how is Aurora less secure than PlayStore directly? GOS devs literally never make sense, and of course they recommend a app store that doesn’t even properly label non open/free apps distincly, it is not like they evwr cared about FOSS just vague “security” theater

      • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 hours ago

        because aurora store isn’t developed by a big team of professionals with a massive budget, and aren’t getting security audits by other teams of well-funded professionals.

        the point isn’t that aurora store is insecure, the point is that the play store is VERY secure (it’ll just also merrily sell your data to palantir)

        • F3lis_sylv4@anarchist.nexus
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Isn’t the aurora store just a wrapper around the play-store using an anonimized account? That is exactly the reason that google can easily block them. They obviously found a way to stop the burner accounts that Aurora makes from accessing the store. It would be equal to making a container for each time you renew the anonymous account.

          In other words, unless the aurora app has a backdoor (and I believe it is FOSS, so that should show itself easily), it is as secure as the play store ( which has debatable security, I believe it served malware on several occasions )

          But please correct me if I’m wrong

          • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            AFAIK aurora store is a completely separate implementation, it’s certainly not based on the play store in any way since it’s open source.