Been trying to get away from DuckDuckGo because of their support of “AI” stuff, but come on, one of these isn’t even in English, and that’s what I have my language set to.

  • cloudskater@pawb.socialOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    I know. I’m trying not to use DuckDuckGo because of their AI support. I was told this was a good search engine to use instead, but it often spits random stuff back at me.

      • opensource1312@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        1 day ago

        im guessing op is aware that you can turn ai off, but generally opposed to using duckduckgo since they are generally a pro ai company

        • zikzak025@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 day ago

          That’s my take as well. You can also remove AI results from Google by adding the &udm=14 string to force web results only, but it doesn’t absolve them of blame for how much they push AI. DDG deserves equal criticism.

          It’s like old Reddit. Sure it still exists, but it only gets worse and worse as they double down on the version everyone hates until the majority don’t even know there’s another option. And there’s no guarantee they keep supporting the option that makes them less money.

        • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 day ago

          Possibly, though as another commenter mentioned, using the noai URL for the moment is a good way to voice discontent. Not using it just falls into the “everyone uses google” narrative in a different way.

    • LostWanderer@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      SearXNG is a mixed bag to be honest…I find that Ononoki’s SearXNG delivers decent results…It’s a bit mixed at times with PieFed being the third option. Some topics are surfaced better than others, so your mileage will vary with SearXNG.

      Using the No AI version of DuckDuckGo sends them a message that their bet on “AI” isn’t going to win them any accolades. It’s an easy way to push back. As they are tracking those metrics and people can see the numbers of how many users disapprove of AI.

      • potatoguy@mbin.potato-guy.space
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        Bing and yahoo are VERY bad, it seems they detect that they are being used through proxies, I made another comment for what i use in searxng.

          • potatoguy@mbin.potato-guy.space
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 day ago

            They give different results, it seems they have different treatment to the data, which is interesting. Startpage gives different results than google, duckduckgo gives different results than bing, but on the bigger picture, a bigger sample gives the statistically optimal result??? (closer to the source truth on the most probable good result) question mark, huge number theory on statistics.

            (i’m drunk)

              • potatoguy@mbin.potato-guy.space
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 day ago

                In searxng they don’t give the same results, bing brings some completely different stuff both on an selfhosted instance and on an public instance (it just gives random garbage), it seems proxying does some stuff to bings internal algorithm, as google is different than startpage on searxng.

                Edit: a screenshot showing it.

            • Given the same methodology (search algorithm) a larger sample size gives a truer picture of what that methodology favors. If the methodology isn’t neutral or doesn’t bias in the same way as your desired outcome then a smaller sample size analyzed by a different methodology may provide better results.

    • starblursd@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      I use brave search, in the settings you can turn off ai answer and anonymous telemetry

        • Jack@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          22 hours ago

          Several useless slop paragraphs in that article - seems to have been written by LLM.

          Human summary: Brave is a Chromium-based browser that is recommended by some for privacy. It’s created by homophobe and Republican donor Brendan Eich, who was asked by several Mozilla employees to resign and led to half of Mozilla’s board to step down. After OKCupid started pointing out his homophobia to Mozilla browsers users, he finally quit.

          After that he created Brave with millions of dollars from amongst others Founders Fund’s FF Angel, Propel Venture Partners, Pantera Capital, Foundation Capital, and Digital Currency Group.

          In 2016 the “Brave Ad Replacement” was announced which would replace ads on pages with ones injected by Brave, paying in crypto.

          Brave collected donations in their crypto on behalf of people like Tom Scott without asking them, and when Tom found out and told Brave to stop, Brave said “refunds are impossible”.

          In 2020 Brave Browser silently injected referral links into URLs of crypto wallets containing Brave’s affiliate code.

          By default they display sponsored images as the background for the home and new tab pages.

          In 2021 Brave Browser exposed the .onion domains people visited as part of the DNS traffic so their ISPs could track users.

          In 2023 Brave announced that they’d be selling their search data to AI companies, and prevented sites from opting out of this even if they asked not to be scraped by Brave.

          In 2024 Brave deprecated their option for Strict fingerprinting protection.

          Brave also paid for advertisement whenever users searched for “Firefox” in the Play Store, displaying “Forget the Fox”, which Brave’s VP (who promoted NFTs and FTX with AI) denied - meaning he was lying or didn’t find out before denying it.

        • U7826391786239@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          24
          ·
          1 day ago

          it seems crazy to me that people still use brave–i’ve been reading nothing but terrible shit about them for years

          • myrmidex@belgae.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 day ago

            Same, been there too. Still, it’s easy to miss articles on them, they only pop up once every so often. Same for Proton.

            • Tchallenge@awful.systems
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              22 hours ago

              I might be a bit out of the loop, what about proton? I know they have their own AI chatbot, but did I miss anything else about them? AFAIK they are nowhere near Brave in terms of being utter garbage.

                • Tchallenge@awful.systems
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  19 hours ago

                  Thanks for the reply and source! I am not a fan of this, but not quite convinced to switch yet. May I ask what you switched to or what alternative email providers you could recommend? From my not very in-depth research, self-hosting an email server seems to be quite a nightmare.

                  • Arcadeep@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    10 hours ago

                    I’ve been using Startmail recently. I really like that it lets you create multiple different permanent ‘aliases’ and can even create temporary aliases

                  • myrmidex@belgae.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    19 hours ago

                    I was weary of self-hosting email myself too, didn’t want to go down that rabbit hole. After some searching, I’ve landed on migadu.com. I just renewed the subscription after the first year, was 19$ a year for the micro plan, which is more than enough for my needs. Not sure why they use dollars though, as they are a Swiss company.

                    So far no problems, have ~10 of my domains hooked up for email.

                    The only downside I can spot is it’s bring-your-own-domain, so take that into account.

      • gwl [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 day ago

        So you know:

        CEO is a anti-vaxxer anti-masker asshole, and incredibly pro-AI and pro-crypto.

        Also the browser did at one point “accidentally” have a crypto farm built into it.

        • starblursd@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          I’m so tired of the insistence that you have to agree with everything that the CEO does or says if you use a piece of software… You can turn off the ai and crypto in browser settings with a couple clicks. Also I’m talking about the search engine not the browser. I don’t use the browser purely because the Linux builds split mode doesn’t work nearly as clean as Zen, plus i prefer Firefox forks

          I use it cause it’s a search engine that gives good results and that can disable ai answers… Until I’m able to get my server PC finished to selfhost searxng

          Edit they actually slopped up the browser to the point it’s beyond disabling it. Literally just garbage

          • gwl [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            20 hours ago

            I could understand your point if they were literally the only option

            But they’re not.

            So why choose the worst option when better exist?

            And you know how money works right? The CEO gets money for your continued usage of their products and services. So by using it, you directly support all their shitty views.

            • starblursd@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 hours ago

              Really not how that works… Do you use a phone? Guess you agree with child labor then cause they make money from your purchase

              • gwl [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                6 hours ago

                Did you read this part at all?

                I’m pretty sure the answer is no.

                I could understand your point if they were literally the only option But they’re not. So why choose the worst option when better exist?

          • starblursd@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            I don’t care what a CEO (for free software) thinks or says I care what the software does. Is the software good?.. The browser no. It’s complete garbage the search engine. Yeah it’s pretty decent. If the CEO’s garbage ideals bleed into the software like it does in the browser, yeah it’s trash. The search engine like almost every other mainstream search engine has AI answers except unlike a lot of others it lets you turn that off. It doesn’t skew results towards his ideals, doesn’t bury results under sponsored links, Has no crypto nonsense, it’s just a search engine. It’s not that deep