• dhork@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 day ago

    For an impeachment to result in removal from office, you only need 1/3 of the House, but 2/3 of the Senate. Because only about 1/3 of the Senate is up for re-election in any given year, it’s pretty much impossible for Democrats to get there in one election. So, even if Democrats take control of the Senate, they would need 15 or so Republicans to go along with it for it to stick. That is extremely unlikely.

    Overriding a Presidential veto takes 2/3 of both houses. But I think that is much more likely to happen if Democrats take control of both houses, because they can start negotiating with Republicans and put enough things for them to vote for in bills to reach that threshold. Members will have an easier time voting against the President in individual bills than they would on impeachment. I think he would actually be more pissed off if multiple vetoes get overridden than he would if they successfully impeach him.

    • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      17 hours ago

      If they flipped all 20 current Republican held seats this year, and keep all of the currently Democratic held seats, they could actually hit 69 Democrat Senators, but that’s highly unlikely.

      • dhork@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        16 hours ago

        they could actually hit 69 Democrat Senators

        Not likely, but it would be…

        … Nice!

        • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Nice.

          Yes. The nicest part is that they would need 4 sacrificial lambs to keep maintaining the status quo, on every single vote, since 66 is Filibuster proof.