what if
  • Communities
  • Create post
  • Create community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
silence7@slrpnk.net to Green Energy@slrpnk.netEnglish · 3 days ago

Solar Has Crossed a Critical Economic Tipping Point | Solar now requires no more upfront capital than coal or gas to produce the same annual electricity

oilprice.com

external-link
message-square
55
link
fedilink
1
external-link

Solar Has Crossed a Critical Economic Tipping Point | Solar now requires no more upfront capital than coal or gas to produce the same annual electricity

oilprice.com

silence7@slrpnk.net to Green Energy@slrpnk.netEnglish · 3 days ago
message-square
55
link
fedilink
Solar Has Crossed a Critical Economic Tipping Point | OilPrice.com
oilprice.com
external-link
Solar now requires no more upfront capital than coal or gas to produce the same annual electricity, reversing a disadvantage that was as large as five-to-one a decade ago.
  • Sour_Kabos@reddthat.comBanned
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    What about the absurd amount of land it takes?

    • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      can be leased, and at end of lease, land is free for any use. ie. it is not polluted. Fossil plants need exclusion zones for air pollution and noise, and still depress neighbour property values.

    • livligkinkajou@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      Putting solar panels on land used for biofuels would produce enough electricity for all cars and trucks to go electric:

      Remember that you can still use the land for a more useful agricultural crop with higher¹ or similar² yield³ with agrivoltaics

      You can also put panels over parking lots. USA alone has more parking lot land area than some countries:

      • ikidd@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        Biofuels: the least efficient form of solar power one could possibly invent.

        • Einskjaldi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          It’s fine if you have ample fields and a low population with an excess of food.

          • ikidd@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 days ago

            It’s mainly there as a form of farm subsidy that bypasses restrictions thrown up by long-existing trade agreements. Canada provides no farm subsidies besides underwriting crop and moisture insurance premiums to an extent, but the US has a long history of flouting these restrictions.

            As usual. Coincidentally it provides money for equipment manufacturers and inputs providers like Deere and Cargill. But I’m sure that’s just a happy coincidence of providing “food security”.

Green Energy@slrpnk.net

energy@slrpnk.net

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !energy@slrpnk.net

Everything about energy production and storage.

Related communities:

  • Electric Vehicles
  • Offgrid living
  • Hydrogen@fedia.io
Visibility: public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 4 users / Day
  • 76 users / Week
  • 169 users / Month
  • 200 users / 6 months
  • 0 local subscribers
  • 4.57K subscribers
  • 133 Posts
  • 333 Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • poVoq@slrpnk.net
  • Steve@slrpnk.net
  • UI: 0.19.17
  • BE: 0.19.20-modified
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org