I think he might just have a fetish for losing.

    • resipsaloquitur@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Hmmm.

      You make a good point.

      On the other hand, look at the history of presidents and their parties. It ALWAYS swaps parties unless there is a particularly popular vice president. Literally, back to Washington.

      The US isn’t like Japan where the LDP wins consecutive elections for decades on end.

      The republican candidate was GOING to win in 2016.

      We are now in a time of chaos. I feel Dems will probably sweep the midterms and maybe win in 2028, but it’s unclear. We’ve only had one nonconsecutive president before.

      I wouldn’t put money on James (Vance).

      • BonsaiBoo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        36
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Remember when the Supreme Court interfered in the presidential election because of hanging chads and effectively kept Gore from winning, thus leading somehow to the death of Harambe and bringing us to the bad place dimension where everything always gets worse and almost always in the worst way possible?

        Yeah… like you said, history likes to repeat itself.

        • resipsaloquitur@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          Oh yes; I remember the Brooks Brothers riot.

          Begging the question — was Al Gore a particularly popular vice president?

          Having lived through it, I would say no.

          Which doesn’t mean Dubya was wildly popular. Only that Al wasn’t.

          Whether Dubya won legitimately, the national mood wasn’t four more years of Clinton.

          • BonsaiBoo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            13 hours ago

            Trumps approval rating when he was elected the second time was 47%. Al Gore’s approval rating when he lost the 2000 election was 62%.

          • grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Should’ve called it the Brook Brothers coup. Because in retrospect, that’s what it was.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        look at the history of presidents and their parties. It ALWAYS swaps parties unless there is a particularly popular vice president

        No it doesn’t.

      • First_Thunder@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Not really though, post civil war there was a 40 year pause where no democrats were president iirc until Wilson won due to Teddy Roosevelt splitting the vote

        • PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Yeah because the Dixiecrats were traitors… Then the democrats held a tight grip on congress after the depression and FDR was president for 10+ years.

      • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        That’s because both sides are shit and just keep the rich and powerful, rich and powerful, in exchange for money.

        • Oyml77@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          15 hours ago

          This is the shit that is put out there to keep people from being involved in politics because “why bother if both sides are the same?” and to deflect blame from the fact that the right is objectively worse in every fucking way. The Democratic party has a lot of problems and is in need of of a huge pull to the left, but it is better than the alternative. Dismissing it this way solves nothing.

          • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 hours ago

            Well we could always keep doing like the past dozen decades and endlessly have the population flopping back and forth between two parties and always pissed and screwed but never doing anything real about it other than “you have to vote guys. That will fix everything”. The system is corrupted. Voting isn’t going to fix it.

    • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Right. Standing up there and yelling “there’s that f__ talk again!” as some kind of response, ala Idiocracy would be a huge selling point for the Tribe That Rub Shit In Their Hair. The pig people loooove that kind of stuff - they are intimidated by competency, expertise and people that are smarter than them. An idiot like donnie or Petey are their idea of “common sense” politicians.

      That, combined with enough of the apathetic staying home as well as the armchair “leftists” that love to tell everyone how it is useless to vote, (at least to actually vote for a candidate that can actually win) and you’ll get Petey in office…