This article (originally posted here: https://crust.piefed.social/c/long_reads_rss@crust.piefed.social/p/128158/mefi-how-to-spot-a-psychopath) is intereting because the research behind it is interesting, and as most of you assumed on sight it goes where you think it does, but it actually goes further.

I had not heard of or considered this before but it references:

The idea of a “pathocracy”, a democracy of normal people taken over by psychopaths, was conceived by an obscure Polish psychologist, Andrew Lobaczewski, who had lived under both the Nazis and then Soviet-era communists. His ideas never landed, because “the psychology publishers thought it was too political, and the political publishers thought it was too psychological,” according to editor and blogger Harrison Koehli. It’s unfashionable to the point of being taboo in psychiatry and psychology now to ascribe personality disorders to public figures. “One of the perils of bringing psychology into politics is that it’s very easy for anyone with any given political perspective to look at their political enemies or rivals and say: ‘OK, well, they’re all psychopaths,’” says Koehli. There’s also the Goldwater Rule, which established as a psychiatric principle that professionals are not allowed to diagnose public figures they haven’t had clinical contact with or met (this was after 1,189 psychiatrists declared Barry Goldwater unfit to be president in the 1964 election). Viding, however, finds the fixation with diagnosis perhaps irrelevant in this context. “I always find the obsession with diagnosing these people interesting. You don’t need to diagnose them, there are a set of personality traits, and you can recognise individuals with those traits. If someone’s in political power, you can see those exemplified in behaviour, and most people are perfectly capable of making an assessment of what that signifies.”

It’s like a light going on over “why does it feel like we’re living in crazytown?” It’s not just the one guy.

The article is worth a read.

  • Corvidae@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    23 hours ago

    The conclusion talks about needing to inoculate people against being victimized. Seems like a pipe dream if we indeed have a pathocracy. Psychopathy is estimated at 1% in the general population, but in CEOs, it’s estimated at values up to 20%. It seems psychopaths seek high hierarchy.

    • hoppeduponcoffee@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Being that the capitalist class views everyone else as expendable ants, and values property and wealth over human life and dignity, 20% doesn’t surprise me in the least. If we include narcissists in the mix, the figure probably goes substantially higher.

      These fucking people had their own island where they kidnapped and imprisoned young girls to be raped for entertainment.

    • HumanOnEarth@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      22 hours ago

      They don’t necessarily seek it, Capitalism rewards ruthless behavior.

      CEOs cannot generally become CEOs without having to leave their empathy at the door. Guess who can’t feel empathy to begin with? Eureka.

      • Corvidae@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        21 hours ago

        If capitalism rewards ruthless behavior, why do we teach our kids in schools to be nice to each other?

        • cheese_greater@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          21 hours ago

          Because it makes it easier to control them. Pro-social behavior should be valued and prioritzed but there is also a risk people become too people-pleasing and are not taught to protect themselves and importantly not how to be an “asshole” when necessary.

          All three are necessary but the last is its own form of dark magic.

        • Pucker8736@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          20 hours ago

          I mean… It would be in the interest of those with power, who are more likely to be psychopaths, to encourage empathy development in the broader public.

        • SnoopSqueak@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          20 hours ago

          So we can blame “bad behavior” on children instead of their shitty parents or the shitty systems that make life unbearable.

          How many schools teach kindness? Mostly, the schools I went to taught that “if you defend yourself, you will be punished.” “If you do everything right but someone else won’t be quiet, the whole class will be punished.”

          I went to public schools in the bible belt. It was nightmarish. School shootings are tragic, but unsurprising given how children are treated.

          • Corvidae@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            19 hours ago

            How many schools teach kindness?

            It was called “citizenship”, we received it as a separate grade in public grade school, but that was in California.

            • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              13 hours ago

              Guy who went through the all grades in California, never heard of that. Maybe its cause I’m in the Inland Empire or maybe it predated or postdated me but yeah.

          • Corvidae@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            19 hours ago

            According to search, private grade schools also teach citizenship, and that it includes honesty, kindness, sharing, and following rules.

          • Corvidae@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            18 hours ago

            That’s not an answer. Humanonearth’s hypothesis was that we have a capitalist system that is predatory, so then I wondered (and let me rephrase slightly), why don’t we teach our kids in schools to lie and deceive, basically to be psychopaths, if that’s what brings in the big bucks in the corporate world?

            Your response made me think of the following line in the article which I’ve formatted as bold:

            In the non-criminal, non-violent space of endless persecution – as might happen in a workplace – there are layers of disbelief. People can’t fathom that the Dark Personality is dark, they can’t believe that anyone would want to be deliberately harmful, they can’t process that harm was caused at all. It was bracing to hear Mitchell describe workplace suicides as an issue that partly spurred her research, since it is completely forbidden, in the mental health world, to ascribe a person’s suicide to anyone else’s behaviour. Yet a landmark ruling in France did exactly that in 2019, and found “torment” in the workplace, linked to a number of executives, had created the culture at France Télécom in which 19 employees took their own lives, 12 attempted suicide, and eight suffered from serious depression, between 2006 and 2009. Jane Monckton-Smith, professor of public protection at the University of Gloucestershire, has said in the past that, if we included provoked suicides, domestic homicide statistics could be multiplied “five, six or seven times”.

            • AWistfulNihilist@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 hours ago

              It wasn’t an answer! I think this is the most text I’ve ever gotten back for a two word response, I’m proud of you and your ability to ascribe deep and significant meaning to it.