• privatepirate@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    2 days ago

    Sadly some people do want flock cameras because they think it’s worth it to have a better chance of catching criminals even if our personal liberties get taken away. It’s the age old freedom vs safety discussion.

    • Amju Wolf@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      20 hours ago

      The thing is though you could have both, at least to a degree. You could have much more transparent policing, the cameras could do processing purely locally and based on publicly accessible lists with listed reasons for why the given plates are captured, you could make it so that the only ones who do get the data are actually thr police and not thr company selling the cameras, etc.

      But that’s not in the interest of Flock, or even really the powers that be. The surveillance machine needs feeding, doesn’t matter for what cost.

      • privatepirate@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Yes, I agree very much with your statement. I think our lives would be much better if our government was built like an open source project lol

    • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 days ago

      Maybe a year or so ago, but now those same people are starting to understand the definition of criminal is flexible.

      • privatepirate@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        I agree that the more popular opinion is changing to more freedom, but most of the older millennials and above that I talk to care more about catching criminals because they are more likely to be influenced by Facebook/Nextdoor posts and the mainstream media.