destructdisc@lemmy.world to Fuck AI@lemmy.world · edit-22 months agoFuck AI.lemmy.worldimagemessage-square13linkfedilinkarrow-up13arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up13arrow-down1imageFuck AI.lemmy.worlddestructdisc@lemmy.world to Fuck AI@lemmy.world · edit-22 months agomessage-square13linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareSharkWeek@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up0·2 months agoAnd megaliters of fresh water.
minus-squareGissaMittJobb@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up0arrow-down1·2 months agoThe water-thing is mostly bullshit, see https://andymasley.substack.com/p/empire-of-ai-is-wildly-misleading / https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H_c6MWk7PQc
minus-squareorwellianlocksmith@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoYeah, thanks, this random substack and YouTube video definitely are credible and trustworthy sources.
minus-squareGissaMittJobb@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up0arrow-down1·2 months agoAs opposed to your vibes?
minus-squarea_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoAs opposed to the many reputable news sources and scientific publications that run contrary?
minus-squareGissaMittJobb@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up0·2 months agoI mean, I’m certain that if you consider there to be many reputable scientific publications having studies to the contrary, you should at least be able to post a single one, right?
minus-squarea_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoSure. Here is a decent one: Environment and sustainability development: A ChatGPT perspective Priyanka Bhaskar, Neha Seth Applied Data Science and Smart Systems, 54-62, 2024 Point is finding it or the dozens like it take like 2 seconds on Google scholar.
minus-squareGissaMittJobb@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up0arrow-down1·2 months agoGreat! Now, where in the paper did you find the primary claims about water consumption? (There are none. You didn’t read the paper)
minus-squaremojofrododojo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0arrow-down1·2 months agoif you can refute it please do. don’t talk about it, do it.
And megaliters of fresh water.
The water-thing is mostly bullshit, see https://andymasley.substack.com/p/empire-of-ai-is-wildly-misleading / https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H_c6MWk7PQc
Yeah, thanks, this random substack and YouTube video definitely are credible and trustworthy sources.
As opposed to your vibes?
As opposed to the many reputable news sources and scientific publications that run contrary?
I mean, I’m certain that if you consider there to be many reputable scientific publications having studies to the contrary, you should at least be able to post a single one, right?
Sure. Here is a decent one:
Environment and sustainability development: A ChatGPT perspective
Priyanka Bhaskar, Neha Seth
Applied Data Science and Smart Systems, 54-62, 2024
Point is finding it or the dozens like it take like 2 seconds on Google scholar.
Great!
Now, where in the paper did you find the primary claims about water consumption?
(There are none. You didn’t read the paper)
if you can refute it please do.
don’t talk about it, do it.