• blitzen@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    Comes down to if you want to assign blame or prevent it from happening to you.

    Yes, if you’re riding without a helmet and hit by a car, the car is (probably) still at fault. But if your primary concern is avoiding brain damage, you wear a helmet.

    You’ve chosen hyperbole in your hypothetical in a dangerous neighborhood. More to the point is wearing an expensive watch while in a dangerous neighborhood. If you’re rolled and the watch stolen, it’s the fault of the thief. But maybe a better idea to put the Rolex in your pocket when downtown after dark.

    • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      I think my analogy is way more similar than yours.

      Make your own decisions about how you keep yourself safe. But once you start victim blaming, expect criticism.

      • blitzen@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        Nope. We’re talking basic common sense precautions. Not “body armor.”

        • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          “Common sense” stems from the cultural context. Which in this case is carbrained.

          Most other countries do not consider a helmet a necessity for riding a bike.

          • blitzen@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            I ride exclusively on bike trails, away from any cars. Other countries are wrong on this one.

              • blitzen@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                I’m not going to edit my comment, but I shouldn’t have said exclusivity. I should have said that most of my mileage is ridden away from cars, and thus wearing a helmet isn’t due to proximity to cars. I wear a helmet when I’m riding in car traffic as well, but not because of the cars.

                Riding a bike anywhere without a helmet is disregarding your safety. I’m not saying it needs to be legislated, but don’t pretend you’re enlightened because you rawdog your bike.

                • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  It’s all about risk tolerance. Wearing a helmet on a bike keeps you a little safer. Wearing body armor keeps you a little safer. Those are facts. But the decision as to what actions to take to keep oneself safe is a personal decision. As such, it may be reasonable to advise people of that information so they can make a better decision. But insulting them for failing to take advice you personally consider common sense is just rude. And when you’re insulting them and ignoring the person actually creating the danger… well that’s why the term carbrain was invented.

                  • blitzen@lemmy.ca
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    2 days ago

                    I support people who choose not to wear a helmet; they’ve obviously already experienced brain damage.