From a purely argumentative standpoint, that doesn’t mean that one of them isn’t. Again, strictly from a rhetorical point of view.
These things are already illegal from our other laws
From a rhetorical point of view, strictly, one could say, if one were to defend the statement, which I’m not, but one could, hypothetically say that any religion actively espousing those things is worthy of condemnation regardless of our laws.
From a purely argumentative standpoint, that doesn’t mean that one of them isn’t. Again, strictly from a rhetorical point of view.
From a rhetorical point of view, strictly, one could say, if one were to defend the statement, which I’m not, but one could, hypothetically say that any religion actively espousing those things is worthy of condemnation regardless of our laws.
Same goes for this. Hypothetically.
Yeah I don’t know either. Even hypothetically.
No notes.