• eleitl@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    10%, chances are very good that you’re it.

    Not that it matters much, postfossil indefinitely sustainable planetary population is a lot less than one billion, perhaps as low as 100 million. It would be just 500000 if we were a just another species our size.

      • eleitl@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yes, we haven’t been longterm sustainable even since preindustrial times. Worse, the carrying capacity after all is sung and done will be a lot lower than the preindustrial one.

      • eleitl@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        18 hours ago

        I do, or close enough.

        Did you read my second paragraph, about the postfossil planetary ecosystem carrying capacity? And no, without fossil fuels you can’t build and maintain renewable or nuclear energy infrastracture, either.

    • cub Gucci@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      This. And it’s 10% by income and not 10% by wealth. If you are even in the 2% of income ($180k/y), you’re basically a wageslave with a chance not to retire in time