GNOME Boxes lead developer Felipe Borges has been overhauling the application with a major rewrite and today announced the new beta release. GNOME Boxes has migrated to using the GTK4 toolkit and libadwaita. The new GNOME Boxes code can also handle installing Microsoft Windows 11 now without needing any manual workarounds for Secure Boot or TPM requirements.

The new GNOME Boxes code also introduces a VSOCK device for accessing VM contexts and other improvements. With the revamped GNOME Boxes, it’s also shifting to a Flatpak-first and only model for distributing of new GNOME Boxes releases.

  • eldavi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    i tried that with x forwarding over ssh and it didn’t work all that well; what’s why i switched to vnc.

    • the_weez@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      Like arsecroft says, virt manager has this ability built into the application itself. You add another session to the ui and choose ssh. No X forwarding needed, no gui needed on the server at all, don’t need the virt manager app on the server just the client. Cockpit also works as a web based ui.

      • xthexder@l.sw0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Oh that’s good to know. I’ve got roughly the same VNC setup with virt-manager, so I’ll have to try it out. I would get rid of this VM if I could, but it runs CI for my Windows builds. Since I daily Linux now, it’s the only way I’ll know if I break MSVC.

      • eldavi@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        NICE! i didn’t catch that part and thank you for making me aware.

        i did try cockpit and i had better luck with it too.

    • Arsecroft@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      you can use ssh to forward the port and then use virt-manager locally to manage the remote server

      • eldavi@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        i gave that a shot too. it works, it’s just that the vm management was only part of what i needed since it also controlled the sdn.