• VitoRobles@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      76
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      These devices are expensive.

      Teenage girls - If you spot them… Grab them and smash them.

      • Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        And don’t be afraid to smash the face that wears them. Collateral damage, after all, is always expected.

        • matlag@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Well… my daughter is authorized by her parents to use as much violence as she deems appropriate to anyone who would harass her.
          But we all know that would get her expelled from the school for 1… or 3… or every day(s).

          If you add to that from the comments above that kids with perv-glasses are from rich families, probably contributing significantly to whatever charity in the school, they may not get the justice they deserve.

          So smash the glasses, ok. Make a show, and be sure everyone hears loud and clear “fucking pervert”. Reputation can’t be bought back easily.

      • M137@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        As much as I haye the existence of these devices, independent of context bit especially for what this thread is about, I think that isn’t a good idea. I do not trust that the girls have backing and are safe by doing this, any kid who has something this expensive will have parents that have power enough to really fuck with the lives of any girl who’d do this.
        I wish this wasn’t the case, but waves widely at the world proves otherwise.

    • Hueristic_Autistic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Showing may age here 🤣 but back in 2005, I had a film camera shaped like a juice box that I thought was the coolest thing on the planet. The straw was how you took pictures, the lens was hidden in the logo.

      There was no film in it because I just wanted to show it off but yeah… School didn’t give a fuck.

      Then again I’m autistic and I was super into the spy stuff. I think that came with one of those spy kits and I annoyed the shit out of my family with those beeping door sensors and I genuinely concerned someone by eating the edible paper. I made one of my sisters friends scream at the top of her lungs because she had no idea who I was when I wore the sunglasses with mirrors to see behind you and a fake mustache and I was into disguises.

      But there’s a difference between being a kid and having fun and things inadvertently happening vs being a menace and a dickhead to those around you.

      • kurcatovium@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        But that’s completely different thing. Pervert glasses allows boys to see fake naked girls, but perv cams at bathroom allows officials to see the real deal. American ucle Donnie would be proud!

    • plantfanatic@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      22
      ·
      2 days ago

      Phones, cameras, watches with cameras, GoPros are all all ready allowed, why would this be any different? Some schools even have equipment to rent to make videos, or their news program has some, yearbook group, etc.

      • ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Using a camera as part of a group project is very different from secretly filming people throughout the school day when they’re supposed to be doing other things.

        Surely you can tell the difference…

        • Venia Silente@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Using a camera as part of a group project

          Well in that case the solution is simply to have the school provide such utensils, for use only in the time period when the project takes place.

        • plantfanatic@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          33
          ·
          2 days ago

          Unlike the security cameras that already do you mean… yeah?

          A school is a public place, there’s no reasonable expectation of privacy.

          • grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            36
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            A school is a public place, there’s no reasonable expectation of privacy.

            I am fucking sick and tired of this absolute garbage argument.

            “No expectation of privacy” does not mean publicizing any video for any purpose is OK. It does not mean stalking is OK. It does not mean a goddamned panopticon is OK!

            What’s happening now – with every act potentially stored in perpetuity, psycho-analyzed, and fed into generative AI for the purpose of deepfaking or who knows what else – is in a wholly different category that goes beyond “public!”

          • AnonAmy the Silly :3@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            25
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            I don’t recall a student being able to bring a security camera to school. In fact, every single security camera I’ve seen in a school has (seemingly) belonged to the school, not to any individual.