“Consequently, the grand jury’s indictment of Mr. Hearn is hard to explain. Mr. Hearn needs to learn whether the grand jury was properly instructed that the charge required him to have caused over $1,000 in damages, when the testimony failed to establish that he caused any damage at all. So does this Court.”

This would be so great of it ended up with the US attorney being disbarred for this.

They say a prosecutor can get a grand jury to indict a ham sandwich - but usually the grand jury isn’t hearing testimony saying there’s no way the sandwich committed any crime.