• HarneyToker@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Pirating is WHY artists see the shit deal from Spotify as swallowable. Fuck you! You’re not entitled to someone else’s music.

      • bss03@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        I don’t think that’s actually the case. Can you show any correllation between piracy rates and Spotify rates or Spotify artists counts?

        All the histories of music streaming platforms I’ve read/heard have rarely mentioned piracy as a motivation at all, and never as a primary reason. Spotify got popular because it was free. It was free because it provided tons of user information to advertisers and music catalogues for targeting. Artists that weren’t part of the big music catalogues joined because of the huge user base.

            • HarneyToker@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              Wow, you got back to me very quickly. So what did your musician friend say?

              Ken Parks, CEO of Spotify, said “Piracy was sort of ingrained in that culture (in reference to pirating programs like Napster). But now Spotify is ingrained in that culture in a way that’s reduced piracy greatly. It’s removed the incentive to pirate.”

              Spotify told British MPs in a parliamentary inquiry that raising its monthly subscription above £9.99 could “push users into piracy” using the piracy threat to resist price increases that would have meant higher royalties for artists.

              Spotify was founded in 2008, a moment when the music industry had been devastated by online piracy. Revenue had already dropped from $14.6 billion in 1999 to $6.3 billion by 2008.

              Spotify has since added filters that cut royalty payments to tracks that don’t reach a certain stream threshold, further adding pressure to smaller artists who had the least leverage to begin with.

              The rise of piracy led directly to the creation and power of streaming services like Spotify. Need me to spell anything else out for you?

              Edit: Waaaaaiting for a response!

              • bss03@infosec.pub
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                All of my musician friends (3) do all their paid music creation live, and aren’t on Spotify. So, they couldn’t tell me their motivation for being on Spotify is; none of them have ever complained about piracy.

                That’s not the evidence I asked for, those are canned statement from Spotify. Do you believe everything Spotify says? They have misled people about their motives before.

                Still, thanks for an least engaging with the premise.

      • Footer1998@crazypeople.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Mate, I’m sorry, but I will absolutely not accept any attempts to shame me into supporting the incredibly exploitative music industry. Artists will create art even without being paid, because that’s how human creativity is. I’m literally an open source developer and I’ve written millions of lines of code without seeing a single penny for my work. Keep yelling into the void if you want, it changes absolutely nothing. If it helps, I also support stealing from corporations. I believe piracy and shoplifting are 100% based and I encourage it as much as I can

        • HarneyToker@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          You’re an idiot if you think paying musical artists for their work is exploitation. Seriously, brain dead. You don’t deserve music.

          • Footer1998@crazypeople.online
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            if you have a way of giving to artists directly, then sure, that’s fine! buying physical media from record labels etc. isn’t worth it imo, you’re just propping up an exploitative industry just so you can feel warm and fuzzy about supporting artists. i don’t want to pay for that, because i do not believe it is righteous.

            my morality is that, I should limit my spending as much as possible, so as to bring about a complete economic collapse of not only the music industry but the entire economy. my morality is likely completely different from yours, which is why I don’t give a shit about your attempts to shame me. it’s literally meaningless to me. your (dis)approval and that of the wider society means less than nothing, because this society we live in is fundamentally sick and disgusting

            • HarneyToker@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              They all sell their music online. I can do without all the personal, emotional garbage from you. Please keep your point succinct.

      • Noggog@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Lol, sure. If piracy disappeared tomorrow they’d still squeeze and monopolize until the stream payments were table crumbs just the same. That’s how corps go; has nothing to do with any of us.

        Buy direct if you actually care about getting cash into a band’s hand.

        • HarneyToker@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Not sure how you did it, but you attempted to refute my point and then went back to argue for it. Buy music from artists and don’t stream, especially do not pirate.

          • Noggog@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            If you read my other post, you’ll see that i hybridize and do both.

            I cant afford to buy every artist that someone flippantly recommends i check out. (8k albums in my library atm) Im not streaming. Pirating is the demo/simmer stage. Followup retroactive purchases are the “yup, good shit” support stage

            When they get my support they’re getting 100% of my money rather than what drips down through Spotify’s grip. I’d say that’s a win for both sides

              • Noggog@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                ?? Chicken and egg? It’s not that i cant afford the things I like. It’s that i need to listen to it first to know if I like it enough to purchase it. If someone recommends me some band I never heard of froma genre im not familiar with, I would like to give it a chance. A heavy portion of the music I love now wasn’t something I knew immediately I would like within 30 seconds of hearing it. The likelihood is their recommendation isn’t for me, but I dont know until I listen a bit and simmer at least a short bit.

                So do I just buy everything anyone namedrops outright? Or do I refuse to give a recommendation any chance whatsoever because I make a guess its not for me before I even listened?