If thoughts are made of information, which seems to Me a logical assumption, then a mathematical operation which reproduces the function of a neural network should be just as capable of thought as the neural network itself. And if the math is accurate, it should think exactly the same things.
It’s not reproducing the function of a neural network, though. It’s mapping pieces of words being near other pieces of words. That’s it. Stop attributing extra shit to a big spreadsheet
Not any more than a picture of you is an artificial simulation of you. It only looks like it. It doesn’t matter what they call it, it’s not a network of neurons or things that even resemble them in function.
If thoughts are made of information, which seems to Me a logical assumption, then a mathematical operation which reproduces the function of a neural network should be just as capable of thought as the neural network itself. And if the math is accurate, it should think exactly the same things.
It’s not reproducing the function of a neural network, though. It’s mapping pieces of words being near other pieces of words. That’s it. Stop attributing extra shit to a big spreadsheet
Nah, LLMs are actually artificial neural networks.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Large_language_model
See? (Does the floss)
Not any more than a picture of you is an artificial simulation of you. It only looks like it. It doesn’t matter what they call it, it’s not a network of neurons or things that even resemble them in function.
https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/artificial-intelligence/large-language-model-llm/
It’s a neural network. Default dances