• John Richard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    I’m not missing, not a zombie… some people cope easier with losing by pretending that antigenocide users are bots. I’m still here though amused that the Cheney-loving genocide supporters that lost still think they are morally and intellectually superior.

    • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      The goal of the bots and trolls was to amplify a false comparison, and generate infighting in the anti-trump crowd. The fact that you still exist here is proof that it was money well spent.

      • John Richard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        So you believe absent bots and trolls that people would have been unified alongside Kamala on their support and commitment to genocide?

        • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          Sure. The goal of those bots and trolls was to smear Kamala and make it seem like she is the same choice as “get the job (genocide) done quickly” trump. There were lots of people saying “I can’t vote for Kamala because of Israel’s genocide” but I never ever heard a single fucking Republican say the same thing about trump. And now we have trump. Well done, dipshits.

          • inv3r510n@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            Bullshit or you wouldn’t of lost an election in a landslide taking the senate and house with ya.

            Liberal tears are so tasty. They can’t handle their shit ass genocidal candidate lost so they blame everybody but their shit ass candidate from a shit ass party for the loss.

      • Fuzzy_Red_Panda@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        Your comment is abhorrent.

        Edit: You don’t know the person you’re talking to. They voted third party and it had no effect on the outcome of the election, yet you are here telling them that they share blame for the harm and death that is about to come to thousands of people at the hands of an authoritarian dictator that they did not vote for.

        That is not true and it is not okay. That is straight up abusive. Direct your anger elsewhere.

      • John Richard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        7 days ago

        My hands are clean. I didn’t support a genocide candidate. Any blood will be on the hands of the Kamala campaign for praising a war criminal and saying that she’d continue paying tax dollars to Israel to massacre innocent civilians.

          • John Richard@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            6 days ago

            Gaza was straight up annihilated under Biden and no I don’t feel righteous because it was still my country supporting it. I am proud to not have personally voted for a candidate that feels righteous supporting those doing the enslaving and genocide though. Your argument that people should vote for the plantation owner cause the other one will own more slaves isn’t appealing and clearly wasn’t a winning strategy. If you were concerned about slaves then you would have rejected the idea of owning plantations altogether.

              • John Richard@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                6 days ago

                You act like Kamala’s position wasn’t a choice she made. Do you think she was under some sort of threat of death if she didn’t support genocide?

                  • John Richard@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    5 days ago

                    So you’re saying that had she not supported genocide, that she wouldn’t have got enough funding to run her campaign? How is that any better? Are you suggesting that Israel has so much money that a candidate can’t win unless they support whatever they do? Hasn’t the left been alleging that Israel having massive influence in American politics and media due to money was an antisemtic trope? How does Bernie win while still trying to stop weapon shipments to Israel?

        • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          “You should have worked with the murderer to kill more people instead of taking a chance calling the cops!”

          I mean ACAB and all that, but damn

          • John Richard@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            6 days ago

            Ah yes the benevolent serial killer that is just expediting the ending of suffering. Kamala was just helping women and kids respawn so they could join back on Team America.

        • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          6 days ago

          You didn’t support a genocide candidate, but you failed to prevent an outcome 100x worse. You claim to wash your hands of it, but you’re using bullshit as soap.

          • inv3r510n@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            You can’t prove an outcome 100x worse because the future hasn’t happened yet.

            With Biden’s behavior towards Russia post election, there’s no guarantee that Harris bringing us into WW3 wouldn’t be 100x worse.

            • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              5 days ago

              You can’t prove an outcome 100x worse because the future hasn’t happened yet.

              Yes, that is indeed how the future works, but I’m confident trump is much worse than Kamala on this issue, based on past events, which tends to be the best predictor of future events.

              Speaking of which…

              With Biden’s behavior towards Russia post election, there’s no guarantee that Harris bringing us into WW3 wouldn’t be 100x worse.

              The term you should lookup is “appeasement”, you should have paid more attention during middle school history, and less attention to whatever conspiracy/propaganda hole that fuckwit opinion dribbled out of.

              • inv3r510n@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                5 days ago

                Cool, why don’t you go look up mutually assured destruction?

                Sorry but trying to get Ukraine into nato was nato poking the Russians. The maiden revolution was a color regime change by the west to throw out a pro Russian leader back in 2014 by Obama’s ambassador Victoria neuland.

                This could of all been avoided, but then how would the military industrial complex goons afford the remodel on their third bathroom in their fourth house?

                • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  5 days ago

                  Cool, why don’t you go look up mutually assured destruction?

                  Uncle Vlad isn’t going to nuke everything he’s got simply because he’s not allowed to have a little bit more of something that is not his in the first place.

                  As for Ukraine wanting to join NATO, that only happens after Russia invaded in 2022. There was a vote in 2014, but it had low support in the populace at the time.

                  You should really examine where you are getting your info from, your view of history and current events is not congruent with reality…

                  • inv3r510n@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    5 days ago

                    Delusional. The second a single nuke no matter how small is dropped is the second they all start flying. He’s desperate to stay in power and the US is desperate to regime change him.

                    I expect Harris, if elected, would of given us higher WW3 chances.

                    We shouldn’t be going through nuclear brinkmanship right now, and there’s been plenty of off ramps to put an end to this but the military industrial complex needs forever wars to function. It’s not a coincidence we find ourselves once again in a forever war just after the last one “ended”.

                    And what happened in 2014? Oh yeah. Some nato fucking around and regime changing in Ukraine. This could of been avoided.

          • John Richard@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            6 days ago

            I didn’t fail to prevent anything. I’ve never been good at lying to myself and others by pretending that bullshit soap is high quality lavender soap. If you want me to sell lavender soap then give me lavender soap to sell.

            • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 days ago

              I didn’t fail to prevent anything.

              Bingo, getting trump elected was the goal all along.

              • inv3r510n@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 days ago

                One could say that of the democrats for forcing an unelected candidate as nominee. She didn’t win a single primary vote. They knew when biden announced re-election that they’d lose with their own polling.

                They don’t give a fuck about you.

                • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  5 days ago

                  Despite all that, trump has been and will be by far the worst president, and there is barely an excuse not to vote against him, and absolutely none at all to vote for him.

                  What makes you think trump gives a fuck about you?

                  • inv3r510n@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    5 days ago

                    Trump doesn’t give a fuck about me.

                    Trump was terrible, I’d still argue that bush 2 was the worst ever.