The meeting was supposed to be Acton’s way of making up for calling trans girls "boys

  • prophetic_moose@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 days ago

    Thanks for the thoughtful reply; best among ones I got. This analysis doesn’t take into account long-term effects. I think voting Acton is voting to lose because it precludes any chance at better future politics. This is the crux of my thinking. I’m familiar with what you’ve laid out, but often don’t see analysis include future elections.

    And we’re at the inflection point of US politics. If people aren’t getting involved, then it’s over anyways, so again, voting Acton is just voting to lose the long-game. We need young people, working class people, everyone talking and organizing IRL.

    Business as usual is a losing game. Gotta spend the effort on strong foundations; something new; something for the people.