Which is your preferred messaging app? I just want some insights about these two.

You may share other messaging apps too.

  • listless@lemmy.cringecollective.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Do you want it to be so complicated that no one you know in real life is able to use it for more than two weeks before they make some kind of mistake or change that deletes their entire message history and identity? Matrix

    Do you want a slim chance that friends and family might use it, but you have to listen to privacy nutjobs tell you your app is a CIA NSA PsyOp and you might as well cc: potus(at)whitehouse(dot)gov all your messages, it’s run by an american non-profit obviously it can’t be trusted? Signal

  • phanto@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    This is how I explained Matrix to my mom: its like an email address, but for chat. You can chat at me, even if we aren’t using the same server, like someone can send an email from Gmail to Hotmail. She got set up and promptly went back to texting me every dang time.

  • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Signal is a centralized, US-based service which requires your phone number (thus your real identity, IE name and address), has social networking graphs of everyone you talk to, and must forward that information to the US government when asked, as well as (by law) not tell you that they’ve been asked to do so. During the Obama era, 60 NSLs were issued for this private information every single day.

    People overlook its privacy concerns for the same reason they do with apple: it has a shiny interface and is easy to use, and makes people very attached to it. Behind all that, is a surveillance network that its creators have explicitly said they do not want it to be able to run in a decentralized, private manner.

    It has a long history of privacy offenses below (such as refusing to publish its server’s source code for years, its reliance on other US tech services (amazon, google), US-government funding, and a US-defense-tank friendly administration) which get ignored or shouted down by many of those above. See the article below.

    Why not signal.

    Pretty much any alternative is better, as long as its not hosted in a five-eyes country, and especially if it doesn’t require phone numbers or real identities like signal does.

    I personally have been using SimpleX for friends and real life contacts, and Matrix for larger more anonymous group chats.

    • Bazoogle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      has social networking graphs of everyone you talk to

      Source?

      US government funding does not mean it’s immediately bad… The internet, thr flu vaccine, closed captioning, and wheather radar were all funded by the US government. A truly secure messaging encryption is beneficial to the United States, and is evem good enough for the president apparently.

      Since their messages are truly secure, it wouldn’t matter where you store them. Just store them in the cheapest places possible. It being centralized makes it far more usable to the average person, making it much more likely for them to use.

  • geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Signal. Matrix was made by Israeli spyware company Amdocs and when an employee was asked about it after the split to a UK company they pretended like Amdocs wasn’t caught in multiple global spyware scandals already.

    • Derin@lemmy.beru.co
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Matrix is literally an open standard, use a server and client written by people you trust, or write your own.

      Signal is made by a private company and is completely closed source.

      • geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Signal is open source but it’s hosted centrally. So you’re trusting their server.

        Matrix is a protocol it’s not hosted anywhere. But the primary developer and host instance now called Element.

        But it being created and initially bankrolled by an Israeli spyware company known for creating backdoors, and the lead devs still refusing to acknowledge that doesn’t inspire me much more confidence.

        If you want privacy SimpleX seems like better option than Matrix.

        • Derin@lemmy.beru.co
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          You can host a server which uses software not written by Element. Same for the client.

          I don’t trust the Signal devs because I have no reason to. I don’t want to use anyone else’s servers unless I’m paying them or they’re paying me 😅

          And I love swapping/trying new clients.

          • dropdrip@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            You glossed over the fact that it came from Israel’s intelligence-community. Its design is woeful–that’s the protocol, regardless of client or server implementation. The project reeks of a state-backed program to get ahead of the increasing desire for encryption in everyday communications. Yet encryption has always been an after thought within that program. All those bridges to funnel different protocols into the program.