Kentucky Governor Andy Beshear sharply criticized Senator Mitch McConnell and the Senate at large over the Kentucky Republican’s prolonged absence from Congress due to health issues.

Beshear, a Democrat, said on Friday that he still had little information about the condition of McConnell, who was hospitalized in mid-June and released from a rehabilitation center earlier this month.

“I’ve received absolutely nothing, and that’s the same that the people of Kentucky have received,” Beshear told MS Now. “This is why the Senate feels broken. These guys don’t think that they have a boss when the people of Kentucky are their boss. They don’t feel like they are accountable whatsoever.”

Beshear called on McConnell to make a video or call into a news show to update the public about his health.

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    2 days ago

    Maybe?

    He was “sent home” but that’s likely a DC residence.

    If he said he was in Kentucky, then Kentucky authorities can (and should) dona wellness check.

    If he said he was in DC, then Kentucky would have to request DC authorities do it.

    These democrats are humiliatingly weak.

    A Governor only has authority in their state…

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yep, I already said Kentucky can request it, but DC could do it unprompted and justify it due to him being a Senator.

        Normally authorities would go years before getting pro-active. It’s only after a family member or employer reports they stopped hearing from them.

        Republicans have the Senate, his family is in on it…

        So the only avenue is Kentucky asking about their representative really.

        In true mcturtle fashion, it’s exploiting a lot of grey areas and norms.

    • ramble81@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      Which means he also has authority to call a special election but he was weak and didn’t do that.

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          29
          ·
          2 days ago

          There’s a lot of accounts that are going to show up and will just keep saying Democrats are useless.

          You won’t be able to use facts or logic to convince them otherwise, because they’re just trying to depress Dem turnout months before a very important midterm election

          • ramble81@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 day ago

            Hahahaha. You’re fucking kidding me. First off, check my tenure and post history here. Second off, I’m very much a “vote blue no matter who, during the general” and a very liberal person. The governor of Kentucky is rolling over and being useless when he should be standing up to what’s going on. Should people vote less? Hell no, I honestly believe voting should be mandatory and that everyone is registered automatically the moment they turn 18. But none of that precludes me from criticizing who is in office.

          • irish_link@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            2 days ago

            Logically I agree. However legally he can’t call a special election. I agree he should be removed but there is no mechanism for that.

            • grue@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              Well, he could have, up until the deadline the other day.

              As for “legally,” guess what: stopping him would require Mitch to file a lawsuit and show up to win the case, which is exactly the fucking point anyway! So the governor should absolutely gone ahead with the appointment regardless of whether it was “legal” and dared the GOP to object to it!

              Like it or not, because of fuckheads like McConnell, this is how US politics works now. You have to try every dirty trick to gain advantage, or you lose to the other assholes who do.

              • NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                5 hours ago

                Literally all that was required of the situation was to call a bluff, that’s all they had to do. Apparently, decorum is more important than actual governance, according the democrats and half the piss ass apologists in this thread.

              • dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 day ago

                He has made the argument that federal law (17rh amendment) supercedes state law on that front and so he’s allowed even now to start a replacement. He just needs to fuckin do it and let someone call him on it though if that’s his position. Take a page out of the trump playbook.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Which mean he would if they found out he was dead or incapable.

        If you don’t understand, ask questions.

        But even genuine ignorance is dangerous right before a big midterm

        • ramble81@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          Are you really that placated by “oh he’s alive, trust us?” with all of the subterfuge that the Republicans do? It would have been easy to call for it and then say “I look forward to be proven wrong when I talk to him in person”

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            Obviously not, and at this point I don’t understand how you’re not understanding this…

            1. Do a welfare check
            2. If he’s dead or incapable, do a special election.

            You’re saying if someone thinks step 1 should be done, they think he’s fine.

            I have no fucking idea why anyone would think that, it’s completely irrational

            Yet here we are…

            It’s like if someone told you they were getting a prostate exam, and you called them an idiot for not thinking they can get cancer.

            Just what the actual fuck are you even talking about?

            • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              2 days ago

              It’s an election season, and an important one at that. The irrational actors are coming out of the woodwork to tell everyone how worthless and incapable they believe the dems are.

              Here we go again…